Skip to content

[SYCL][HIP] Add additional AMD GPU targets #12028

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Dec 26, 2023
Merged

[SYCL][HIP] Add additional AMD GPU targets #12028

merged 14 commits into from
Dec 26, 2023

Conversation

jinz2014
Copy link
Contributor

@jinz2014 jinz2014 commented Nov 28, 2023

The GFX targets are 909, 940, 941, 942, 1033, 1035, 1036, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1103, 1150, 1151, 1200, 1201.

Thanks for your reviews.

@jinz2014 jinz2014 requested review from a team as code owners November 28, 2023 17:26
@@ -932,6 +947,7 @@ SmallString<64> SYCL::gen::getGenDeviceMacro(StringRef DeviceName) {
.Case("gfx906", "AMD_GPU_GFX906")
.Case("gfx908", "AMD_GPU_GFX908")
.Case("gfx90a", "AMD_GPU_GFX90A")
.Case("gfx90c", "AMD_GPU_GFX90C")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing macro additions?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Runtime changes and doc look good to me.

@steffenlarsen
Copy link
Contributor

Tag @npmiller for awareness.

Copy link
Contributor

@gmlueck gmlueck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

spec changes OK

@jinz2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mdtoguchi, could you please approve the pull request if it looks right ? Thanks.

@againull
Copy link
Contributor

againull commented Dec 21, 2023

@jinz2014 Could you please merge the latest sycl branch and resolve conflicts.

@jinz2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jinz2014 Could you please merge the latest sycl branch and resolve conflicts.

I applied the changes to the latest copy of the file. Is that okay ? Thanks.

@againull
Copy link
Contributor

@jinz2014 Could you please merge the latest sycl branch and resolve conflicts.

I applied the changes to the latest copy of the file. Is that okay ? Thanks.

@jinz2014 Sorry, but unfortunately github show that there is still a conflict:
image

Did you push the changes you've made to the latest copy?

@jinz2014
Copy link
Contributor Author

@againull I am confused by the conflict report though I applied the changes to the latest file.

@againull
Copy link
Contributor

@againull I am confused by the conflict report though I applied the changes to the latest file.

No worries, conflict seemed trivial to me so I resolved in the github web interface. I will merge if testing results are fine.

@againull againull merged commit c1ce159 into intel:sycl Dec 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants