Skip to content

Conversation

gmlueck
Copy link
Contributor

@gmlueck gmlueck commented Dec 1, 2023

The correct name is "Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series".

The correct name is "Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series".
@gmlueck gmlueck requested a review from a team as a code owner December 1, 2023 19:12
Copy link
Contributor

@Pennycook Pennycook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're trying to use the correct product names, shouldn't we also remove "PVC" and "ATS-M"? These were codenames for the microarchitectures, and they're not part of the official branding for the products.

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ new partitioning type
`info::partition_property::ext_intel_partition_by_cslice`.

The only Intel GPU devices that currently support this type of partitioning
are the Data Center GPU Max series (aka PVC), and this support is only
are the Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series (aka PVC), and this support is only
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
are the Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series (aka PVC), and this support is only
are the Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series, and this support is only

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ other devices.
On many Intel devices, there is just one available queue index, and there is
therefore no advantage to using the `compute_index` property. However, this
property can sometimes be useful when running on Data Center GPU Flex series
devices (aka ATS-M) or Data Center GPU Max series devices (aka PVC).
devices (aka ATS-M) or Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series devices (aka PVC).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
devices (aka ATS-M) or Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series devices (aka PVC).
devices or Intel(R) Data Center GPU Max Series devices.

@gmlueck
Copy link
Contributor Author

gmlueck commented Dec 6, 2023

If we're trying to use the correct product names, shouldn't we also remove "PVC" and "ATS-M"? These were codenames for the microarchitectures, and they're not part of the official branding for the products.

I have the impression that many people still know the hardware by its code name, though. In addition, we expose the code name in other places like the enumerator architecture::intel_gpu_pvc and command line options like -fsycl-targets=intel_gpu_pvc. Therefore, I think it helps to mention the code name also.

@againull againull merged commit f8deed6 into intel:sycl Dec 13, 2023
@gmlueck gmlueck deleted the gmlueck/gpu-max-name branch December 13, 2023 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants