[SYCL][E2E] Add %{run} to new tests that did not use it

[ayylol]

Added %{run} to lit lines that execute the test binary.
Same change as #15636 to some tests that were added recently.

[ayylol]

@sarnex FYI, you mentioned adding a test to enforce this change. I think it would be good, but from what I can tell these should be caught by #15728 when using build only mode, because it will try to execute the tests without the proper devices.

[sarnex]

@ayylol Will it fail in a way where a user will know how to fix it? If not, is it possible to add that?

[ayylol]

@ayylol Will it fail in a way where a user will know how to fix it? If not, is it possible to add that?

It certainly wouldn't be as spelled out as having a test like no_sycl_hpp_in_e2e_tests.cpp failing. But looking at the logs you would be able to tell since it would fail on the build stage on a lit line that executes the test binary, which we don't expect to happen at that stage.

I would still be in favor for adding a test like this, but currently I have not had any good ideas as to how this could be done. One thing that prevents us from just using grep like the other e2e test requirements checks is the fact that tests are not constrained to name their binaries as one specific thing (could be %t, %t1.out, %t2.exe to name some examples), and the fact that we can use the binary in different ways without executing, (for example we could do something like mv %t ...). Would be open to ideas.