Skip to content

Conversation

aarongreig
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #18764

Looks like the naive level zero implementation now results in a performance regression, I think it's best to revert until l0 can better match the new interface.

@aarongreig aarongreig requested review from a team as code owners July 31, 2025 15:35
@aarongreig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please merge

@sarnex sarnex merged commit d25d6d6 into sycl Aug 4, 2025
48 of 49 checks passed
@bader bader deleted the revert-18764-aaron/enqueueKernelWithArgs branch August 5, 2025 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants