chore(release): Prepare for version 0.0.2 #6
Conversation
This commit introduces new and updated documentation files to improve project clarity and onboarding for contributors and users.
- **README.md**: Enhanced with detailed sections on features, installation, usage, API reference (props, events, player instance access),
and contribution guidelines.
- **DEVELOPER.md**: Added a new guide for developers covering project setup, available scripts, testing, code style, and release process.
- **CONTRIBUTING.md**: Created a comprehensive guide for contributors, including information on reporting bugs, suggesting enhancements,
making code contributions, and pull request guidelines.
- **CHANGELOG.md**: Initialized with a structured format based on Keep a Changelog and Semantic Versioning, documenting the initial release.
Updates the project version to 0.0.2 in package.json and adds a corresponding entry to CHANGELOG.md, documenting the comprehensive
documentation additions.
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis update introduces four new documentation files— Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Updated the NPM downloads badge URL in README.md to use the correct format.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
DEVELOPER.md (1)
69-72: Consider adding an explicit lint / format workflow.The guide mentions “Ensure your code adheres to the existing style” but the repo exposes no linting / formatting scripts. Adding ESLint + Prettier (and a
pnpm lintNPM script) will make the expectation enforceable and avoid style drift.CHANGELOG.md (1)
9-22: Empty “Unreleased” headings can be pruned before cutting the next release.Leaving blank subsections is fine while work is in progress, but once 0.0.2 is tagged the empty bullet groups add noise. Either remove them or add
Nothing yet.so automatic generators don’t mis-interpret.README.md (1)
90-91: Minor grammar tweak in thecuesdescription.Fragmented sentence: “An array of cue points for interactive events. Can be updated dynamically.”
-| `cues` | `CuePoint[]` | `false` | `[]` | An array of cue points for interactive events. Can be updated dynamically. | +| `cues` | `CuePoint[]` | `false` | `[]` | An array of cue points for interactive events that can be updated dynamically. |
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)DEVELOPER.md(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~90-~90: To form a complete sentence, be sure to include a subject.
Context: ...y of cue points for interactive events. Can be updated dynamically. ...
(MISSING_IT_THERE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
3-3: Version bump looks correct – ensure matching Git tag is created.
"version": "0.0.2"is consistent with the CHANGELOG entry. Remember to push av0.0.2tag (or let the release workflow create it) so consumers can retrieve the exact artefact from the registry.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores