Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

MichaelMure
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I needed that for my project so maybe it's useful for you as well :)

Signed-off-by: Michael Muré <batolettre@gmail.com>
@MichaelMure
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed the dangling comma. I don't think I'm to blame for the remaining test fail.

@MichaelMure
Copy link
Contributor Author

@diasdavid Is it planned to support the key api here ? I'd like to avoid using a fork.

If yes I can make a better PR.

@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @MichaelMure. The goal is to support the whole api that go exposes in this library. It would be great if you could a test for the new method.

@MichaelMure
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dignifiedquire what about interface-ipfs-core ? It needs to be properly spec-ed to go there and the api in go-ipfs and here will be adjusted later ?

Signed-off-by: Michael Muré <batolettre@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Muré <batolettre@gmail.com>
@daviddias
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think we will need this to be part of the main interface library, it will be eventually exposed directly through .crypto. Meanwhile this PR looks good, merging it in :)

@daviddias daviddias merged commit 92bdd98 into ipfs-inactive:master May 4, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants