Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

create a collaborative cluster for ressources #326

Closed
RubenKelevra opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

create a collaborative cluster for ressources #326

RubenKelevra opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor

We currently list a lot of ressources like articles, videos, howtos etc.

I propose we create a collaborative cluster to hold those ressources and require the users who wants to add ressources to supply a IPFS CID and a original source link for the ressources.

Or we could just use the currently already existing ipfs-website collaborative cluster, and add a subdomain like ressources.awesome.ipfs.io which just contains the ressources.

But this would increase the size of this collaborative cluster significantly.

@RubenKelevra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hsanjuan what's your opinion on that? Can we grow the IPFS Websites cluster?

@hsanjuan
Copy link
Contributor

We have a large cluster on which we pin everything and that users can send content to (i.e. using the IRC pinbot), but it is not collaborative. We have plans to migrate it and will open it up then. At that point we will be able to split some large items (wikipedia archives, ccc archives) into their own clusters too, I hope.

@2color
Copy link
Member

2color commented Sep 21, 2023

Closing this in an effort to reboot this list while keeping the maintainer overhead as low as possible while still making sure the list is awesome!

See #478 for more info

@2color 2color closed this as completed Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants