feat: fleek deploy

[laurentsenta]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Results against Kubo latest:
(check the action's summary for the full results)

Summary

Tests	Failures	Errors	Skipped
2046	0	0	0

[github-actions]

Results against Kubo master:
(check the action's summary for the full results)

Summary

Tests	Failures	Errors	Skipped
2046	0	0	0

[lidel]

@laurentsenta this works on CI, but there is no way to build locally, or on Fleek.
Was this intentional? Makes it very hard to maintain the thing, or move between providers.

I was unable to build locally cause there was no obvious script to run.
I've pushed my changes into this PR and then manually run Deploy in fleek app which builds from feat/fleek, but nothing changed. https://conformance-ipfs.on.fleek.co still shows old website.

Lmk if i am doing something wrong – meta comment is to simplify this.

Would it be possible to move build steps from this YAML into Makefile target named www?
If we could build the website locally with make www, then we could do the same on Fleek, removing the limitation of having website build being possible only in CI.

(Alternative ideas welcome, not being able to build locally is something we need to fix)

[laurentsenta]

@lidel We deploy fleek-deploy. feat/fleek is a temporary feature branch; it's used to trigger the build until we merge to main.

We're not "just" building a static website from the local content; For every build, we get the latest artifacts & assets from other repositories. So rational here was that Github tokens & Github-related code would stay in Github build system. We'd "just" deploy the build output (fleek-deploy) to fleek.

I get it's not super obvious how the whole thing work, I'll move the code to Makefile and scripts 👍

[laurentsenta]

@lidel I simplified the workflow so you can run it locally using make website (documented in the README).

(edited) A push to a branch won't trigger fleek, this is a known bug apparently.

Solution is to use a github token and have the deploy run in fleek. Benefit is that gives us deploy previews.

[galargh]

I was wondering if we should change the logo since we adopted the 🐙 as, at least interim, logo of IPDX.