Created library "get" that allows us to use ipget with code more easily.

[faddat]

• go 1.17
• re-organized so that we now have a library, "get"

[welcome]

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

• The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions
  and stakeholders linked/mentioned.

• Your contribution itself is clear (code comments, self-review for the
  rest) and in its best form. Follow the code contribution
  guidelines
  if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

• A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on
  any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high
  priority items.

• The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.

• The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

[faddat]

do you want to upgrade CI, or should I downgrade?

[faddat]

I think this is ready to go

[gammazero]

@faddat Thank you for your interest in contributing to this project. Unfortunately, this is not currently the direction we want to go with ipget. We would prefer that a library, that wraps the ability to connect to a local or remote node or create a temporary node to fetch data from IPFS, exists as a separate project/repo.

I would recommend reusing your work here to create a project that does just that. At some point in the future, such a library may be used to replace the functionality inside ipget, making ipget a CLI utility built on top of that library. Or maybe ipget is eventually replaced by a cmd within that library repo.

Again, thank you, but I am closing this PR for the reason stated above.

[faddat]

Very fair, I was just thinking about the same thing.

[faddat]

Here's what I am thinking:

• remove other code from my fork
• Include an example app in my fork
• Rename the whole thing "get"

wdyt?