feat: add support for v8 code coverage #8596

SimenB · 2019-06-23T11:04:13Z

Summary

A first somewhat functioning pass at adding support for v8 based code coverage instead of a babel one. This is mostly untested and completely undocumented, but feedback and usage on real code would be nice.

I opted for a new flag --v8-coverage rather than just repurposing the existing one mostly because I'm quite certain this new implementation is buggy, and people might want to keep using the babel based approach.

Also note that this requires node 8, so we need to wait for Jest 25 to land this.

~~Lastly, this needs istanbuljs/v8-to-istanbul#36, so make sure to yarn link that locally if you want to test this PR out~~

Test plan

Will need to test this more, but running Jest on the new "integration test" results in this:

SimenB · 2019-06-23T11:05:48Z

packages/jest-coverage/package.json

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+  "name": "@jest/coverage",


this module does not (and should not) have to live here. Maybe we can make it part of istanbul-lib-instrument? All it does is start and stop the coverage collection using the v8 inspector API.

/cc @bcoe @coreyfarrell

I don't have time to really look at this currently but I wouldn't object to creating a new module under the istanbuljs umbrella to accomplish this. Maybe @istanbuljs/v8-coverage would be a good name? I think it should be a separate module from istanbul-lib-instrument which pulls in a bunch of babel modules.

FWIW under the istanbuljs org I would not want TS source code but I don't have a problem with having the module include an index.d.ts with public definitions.

👍 I honestly have less concerns about TypeScript, since I've been using it at work these days; would be happy to put up my hand and help take on maintenance burden for this one.

Feel free to take the code from this. Or create the repo and I can push it there.

If you want a separate d.ts. file, here's the built definition:

/// <reference types="node" /> import { Profiler } from 'inspector'; export declare type V8Coverage = ReadonlyArray<Profiler.ScriptCoverage>; export default class CoverageInstrumenter { private readonly session; startInstrumenting(): Promise<void>; stopInstrumenting(): Promise<V8Coverage>; }

For now I stuck it in https://github.com/SimenB/collect-v8-coverage

SimenB · 2019-06-23T11:06:21Z

packages/jest-coverage/src/index.ts

+  async startInstrumenting() {
+    this.session.connect();
+
+    await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {


I lost type info if I used util.promisify, so I just wrapped everything in promises manually

This is an interesting problem to solve. It's possible to strongly type the function returned by util.promisify by using some of the techniques described in this issue or this SO answer (kudos to their authors btw, ingenious ideas).

I tried this myself after reading both of the links above and managed to get it working this way:

Create a conditional type which will be the union type of the variadic arguments.

export type GetOverloadArgs<T> = T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, (...o: infer U6) : void, (...o: infer U7) : void } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | U6 | U7: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, (...o: infer U6) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | U6: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, } ? U | U2 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, } ? U : never;

Add type aliases for the Callbacks and the promisify function itself.
PromisifyOne is just a conditional type which depends on the number of arguments passed (as they're variadic) and the Callback's generic type for reply.
This makes sure that the return type will have the same type as the Callbacks second argument.

export type Callback<T> = (err: Error | null, reply: T) => void; export type Promisify<T extends any[]> = T extends [Callback<infer U>?] ? () => Promise : T extends [infer T1, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, infer T3, Callback<infer U>?]? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2, arg3: T3) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, infer T3, infer T4, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2, arg3: T3, arg4: T4) => Promise : never;

Use the type of util.promisify's argument to obtain it's return type.

declare module 'util' { function promisify<T>(fn: T): Promisify<T>; }

With the tree snippets above you can get the type info for func correctly in the example below:

import { promisify } from 'util'; const asyncWithCallback = (s: string, callback: (error: Error | null, r: number) => void): void => { let err = null; if (s === "err") err = new Error(); callback(err, 10); } const func = promisify(asyncWithCallback); func("not an error"); // `:YcmCompleter GetType` (which uses TSServer) gives me: // const func: (arg1: string) => Promise<number>

I'm not sure why the other examples had to use UnionToIntersection to achieve that so I might have missed something there.

I'm also not sure if the tradeoff between having these complex type definitions versus manually wrapping these in promises is worth it.

Thanks for looking into it! I don't think it's worth the complexity here, but maybe you could upstream those changes to DT? The definitions are here: https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/796b838a15fad73287bad7a88707a9ca04e60640/types/node/util.d.ts#L86-L105

I completely agree, I think this actually belongs to DT's codebase since it's essentially covering what the type defs should be there.

I'll have a look at that, thanks @SimenB 😊

packages/jest-reporters/src/coverage_reporter.ts

SimenB · 2019-06-23T11:07:54Z

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts

+      throw new Error('You need to `stopCollectingV8Coverage` first');
+    }
+    const filtered = this._v8CoverageResult
+      .filter(res => res.url.startsWith('file://'))


this removes node core modules

packages/jest-transform/src/ScriptTransformer.ts

thymikee · 2019-06-23T12:00:41Z

Gave it a quick try locally within Jest, found this issue:

Failing line: node_modules/istanbul-reports/lib/lcovonly/index.js:52:23

packages/jest-runner/src/runTest.ts

lucasfcosta

Hello 😊

I've been reading recent PRs and the util.promisify issue you've had seemed very interesting so I went after a solution for it. Hope it helps.

I'm also amazed by the great work you all have been doing 💖

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts

lucasfcosta · 2019-06-23T16:59:08Z

packages/jest-coverage/src/index.ts

+  async startInstrumenting() {
+    this.session.connect();
+
+    await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {


This is an interesting problem to solve. It's possible to strongly type the function returned by util.promisify by using some of the techniques described in this issue or this SO answer (kudos to their authors btw, ingenious ideas).

I tried this myself after reading both of the links above and managed to get it working this way:

Create a conditional type which will be the union type of the variadic arguments.

export type GetOverloadArgs<T> = T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, (...o: infer U6) : void, (...o: infer U7) : void } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | U6 | U7: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, (...o: infer U6) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | U6: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, (...o: infer U5) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5: T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, (...o: infer U4) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 | U4 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, (...o: infer U3) : void, } ? U | U2 | U3 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, (...o: infer U2) : void, } ? U | U2 : T extends { (...o: infer U) : void, } ? U : never;

Add type aliases for the Callbacks and the promisify function itself.
PromisifyOne is just a conditional type which depends on the number of arguments passed (as they're variadic) and the Callback's generic type for reply.
This makes sure that the return type will have the same type as the Callbacks second argument.

export type Callback<T> = (err: Error | null, reply: T) => void; export type Promisify<T extends any[]> = T extends [Callback<infer U>?] ? () => Promise : T extends [infer T1, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, infer T3, Callback<infer U>?]? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2, arg3: T3) => Promise : T extends [infer T1, infer T2, infer T3, infer T4, Callback<infer U>?] ? (arg1: T1, arg2: T2, arg3: T3, arg4: T4) => Promise : never;

Use the type of util.promisify's argument to obtain it's return type.

declare module 'util' { function promisify<T>(fn: T): Promisify<T>; }

With the tree snippets above you can get the type info for func correctly in the example below:

import { promisify } from 'util'; const asyncWithCallback = (s: string, callback: (error: Error | null, r: number) => void): void => { let err = null; if (s === "err") err = new Error(); callback(err, 10); } const func = promisify(asyncWithCallback); func("not an error"); // `:YcmCompleter GetType` (which uses TSServer) gives me: // const func: (arg1: string) => Promise<number>

I'm not sure why the other examples had to use UnionToIntersection to achieve that so I might have missed something there.

I'm also not sure if the tradeoff between having these complex type definitions versus manually wrapping these in promises is worth it.

packages/jest-transform/src/ScriptTransformer.ts

jeysal · 2019-06-24T21:59:32Z

Awesome! Getting a bunch of

 ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/private/var/folders/nh/_6t8lz3913q6z9346w579mj00000gp/T/jest_dy/jest-transform-cache-30e418979c5b1c567eb69895a4988d5a-ee2f6998f80ad1ca60bb674d9b0eef67/5c/index_5cd7dd727b8225beda9e1a4dd538feed.m
ap'

s on a work project, will try to isolate a repro if I have time

scotthovestadt

Amazing.

scotthovestadt · 2019-06-26T03:15:30Z

Just reviewed the code; haven't tried to actually run it locally yet. I'll take a quick pass at that tomorrow! Exciting stuff!

SimenB · 2019-06-26T07:28:07Z

@jeysal a repro would be awesome 🙂 Seems somehow either the sourcemap is not written to disk or it got somehow moved/deleted as part of the test run. Do you have a custom transformer?

@scotthovestadt Nice, looking forward to it! Something about lcov coverage seems broken (ref @thymikee's simple repro above) and @jeysal's managed to crash it, but it'd be interesting if you got any different errors 🙂 Feel free to push any changes to this branch if you make any adjustments btw

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts

jeysal · 2019-07-10T11:34:46Z

@jeysal a repro would be awesome 🙂 Seems somehow either the sourcemap is not written to disk or it got somehow moved/deleted as part of the test run. Do you have a custom transformer?

Hey Simen, I've found the cause: A custom transform for CSS files that makes them empty modules.
I've created a minimal repro with instructions :)

SimenB · 2019-07-10T14:27:49Z

Thanks @jeysal! Handling it now. It now fails with the lcov report thing than @thymikee reported above.

Added your reproduction as a test (just verifying it doesn't explode)

sandersn · 2019-07-15T23:17:41Z

In case you want a stress test, here is my silly model of 1/10 of typescript's test suite:

// @ts-check
var fs = require('fs')
var ts = require('./typescript.js')
const dirs = [
    '../../ts/tests/cases/compiler',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/ambient',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/salsa',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/jsdoc',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/es6',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/es7',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/es2017',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/es2018',
    '../../ts/tests/cases/conformance/es2019',
]
for (const dir of dirs) {
    for (const f of fs.readdirSync(dir)) {
        test(f, () => {
            const p = ts.createProgram({ rootNames: [dir + f], options: { "lib": ["es2015", "dom"] } })
            const x = ts.getPreEmitDiagnostics(p)
            // TODO: Emit baselines
            // TODO: Compare them
        })
    }
}

You'll need a clone of typescript in the right location relative to this test; this example uses ../../ts.

On my machine, this runs 5272 tests with coverage in 3,000 seconds. I'm running without coverage right now to get a time comparison.

Edit: 500 seconds, or about 6 times faster. That's surprisingly good.

(I'm also getting the crash that @thymikee reports.)

SimenB · 2019-07-16T07:15:45Z

You can probably avoid the crash by setting coverageReporters to exclude lcov, e.g. just ['html']

ballercat · 2019-07-19T17:04:40Z

Thank you for the good work @SimenB !

We have a ton of coverage jobs for a very large repo so perf improvements are welcomed.

I gave this a shot on a pretty large subset of our tests and noticed a problem with outputting lcov results to HTML. There are fatal errors when the istambul lib tries to write HTML files with coverage to disk. After some light debugging I noticed that some files in the CoverageMap set had pretty long relative paths prefixed kind of like /../../../../actual/path/to/file.js, but only for some files, not all of them. This caused istambul to attempt to write to wrong /missing directories (assuming it's doing some path resolving here). I've also tried outputting just the lcov.info files and then post-processing them with genhtml with similar results (seems like the relative paths were baked into .info file).

Wasn't sure if you are aware of this so I figured I'd report it. I have not had a ton of luck making a minimal replicable example but if I have some free time I'll try to spin up a small GH repo for it. We have a pretty complex setup with custom resolver, not sure if that's been tested yet.

EDIT:

Attempted to replicate with a custom resolver but got a different issue this time. GitHub repo here https://github.com/ballercat/jest-v8-coverage-test

Each file (from src) which was resolved via custom resolver ended up not outputting properly in the HTML report. They all have similar error strings, just not the files which were resolved via defaultResolver!

sourceText.split is not a function
TypeError: sourceText.split is not a function
    at Object.annotateSourceCode (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-reports/lib/html/annotator.js:218:33)
    at HtmlReport.onDetail (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-reports/lib/html/index.js:256:19)
    at Visitor.(anonymous function) [as onDetail] (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:34:30)
    at ReportNode.Node.visit (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:114:17)
    at getChildren.forEach.child (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:118:15)
    at Array.forEach ()
    at ReportNode.Node.visit (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:117:24)
    at getChildren.forEach.child (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:118:15)
    at Array.forEach ()
    at ReportNode.Node.visit (/Users/abuldauskas/nonwork/jest/node_modules/istanbul-lib-report/lib/tree.js:117:24)

codecov-io · 2019-12-11T09:20:33Z

Codecov Report

Merging #8596 into master will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is 25.3%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8596      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.93%   64.69%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         278      280       +2     
  Lines       11905    11978      +73     
  Branches     2935     2956      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits         7731     7749      +18     
- Misses       3544     3597      +53     
- Partials      630      632       +2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/jest-config/src/Defaults.ts	`100% <ø> (ø)`	⬆️
e2e/v8-coverage/no-sourcemap/x.css	`100% <ø> (ø)`
packages/jest-config/src/normalize.ts	`77.74% <ø> (ø)`	⬆️
packages/jest-config/src/index.ts	`11.94% <ø> (ø)`	⬆️
packages/jest-config/src/ValidConfig.ts	`100% <ø> (ø)`	⬆️
packages/jest-runner/src/runTest.ts	`2.19% <0%> (-0.25%)`	⬇️
...ckages/jest-reporters/src/generateEmptyCoverage.ts	`66.66% <0%> (-22.23%)`	⬇️
packages/jest-transform/src/ScriptTransformer.ts	`68.63% <100%> (+0.14%)`	⬆️
e2e/v8-coverage/no-sourcemap/Thing.js	`100% <100%> (ø)`
packages/jest-reporters/src/coverage_reporter.ts	`51.21% <13.95%> (-10.62%)`	⬇️
... and 3 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 012fc8b...9c7c353. Read the comment docs.

docs/Configuration.md

packages/jest-test-result/tsconfig.json

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts

thymikee

The results differ quite a bunch from istanbul, but this seems like a good starting point to release an experimental version and let people test it :)

SimenB · 2019-12-16T20:50:34Z

@jeysal wanna look over one last time?

jeysal

@jeysal it works if specifying testEnvironment in config.

Does not for me unfortunately. Did you use Node 12? Might be OS-specific, I can try on macOS tomorrow?

docs/CLI.md

docs/Configuration.md

Co-Authored-By: Tim Seckinger <seckinger.tim@gmail.com>

SimenB · 2019-12-17T08:23:37Z

Does not for me unfortunately. Did you use Node 12? Might be OS-specific, I can try on macOS tomorrow?

Node 10, 12 and 13 all work for me. The example added as e2e test is from your example repo, does running ../../../jest --coverage --coverage-provider v8 work for you? The test passes on both linux and windows on CI

jeysal · 2019-12-17T14:28:10Z

Alright I made another very simple repro https://github.com/jeysal/jest-v8-no-coverage
Instructions in readme, I used Node 12.13.1.
--collectCoverageFrom=index.js doesn't help either, forces the file to show up but still 0%

jeysal · 2019-12-17T14:28:32Z

Or it might be something else wrong? #9319

SimenB · 2019-12-17T15:05:31Z

@jeysal something to do with linking and how we look up envs methinks.

EDIT: Yeah, linking jest-environment-node as well works

jeysal · 2019-12-17T15:35:42Z

Oh ok that works. Do you just delete / not install node_modules before running ../jest/jest? Because if I do that after yarn it still seems to use the local jest-cli.

SimenB · 2019-12-17T15:38:23Z

linking both jest-cli and the node env makes yarn test work. But yeah, I didn't run install before the first attempt

jeysal · 2019-12-17T15:39:42Z

Yes I got that working, was referring to how you did it without linking just with running a jest from somewhere else

github-actions · 2021-05-11T12:06:58Z

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

SimenB requested review from cpojer, aaronabramov, scotthovestadt, thymikee and jeysal June 23, 2019 11:04

facebook-github-bot added the cla signed label Jun 23, 2019

SimenB commented Jun 23, 2019

View reviewed changes

thymikee reviewed Jun 23, 2019

View reviewed changes

packages/jest-runner/src/runTest.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

lucasfcosta reviewed Jun 23, 2019

View reviewed changes

SimenB commented Jun 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

packages/jest-transform/src/ScriptTransformer.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

scotthovestadt approved these changes Jun 26, 2019

View reviewed changes

lucasfcosta reviewed Jul 4, 2019

View reviewed changes

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

shinnn mentioned this pull request Jul 4, 2019

Jest doesn’t support V8 built-in coverage reporting bcoe/c8#126

Closed

SimenB force-pushed the v8-coverage branch from 7349b6b to 11b1277 Compare July 10, 2019 14:27

SimenB force-pushed the v8-coverage branch from 11b1277 to 9dad3a2 Compare July 10, 2019 14:34

SimenB mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2019

Enabling code coverage breaks source maps #8684

Closed

SimenB force-pushed the v8-coverage branch from 9dad3a2 to 5af4a83 Compare July 16, 2019 14:33

scythargon mentioned this pull request Jul 20, 2019

add support for 1:many source-maps istanbuljs/v8-to-istanbul#21

Closed

bcoe mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2019

Coverage formats very different when testing the same code via Jest and when converting from v8 istanbuljs/v8-to-istanbul#56

Closed

SimenB mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2019

Jest 24 is slower than Jest 23.6.0 on the same test suite #7811

Closed

SimenB force-pushed the v8-coverage branch from 5af4a83 to 67cc358 Compare August 22, 2019 13:21

lint

98b4f49

thymikee reviewed Dec 11, 2019

View reviewed changes

docs/Configuration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

remove old doc change

cf34642

thymikee reviewed Dec 11, 2019

View reviewed changes

packages/jest-test-result/tsconfig.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

thymikee reviewed Dec 11, 2019

View reviewed changes

packages/jest-runtime/src/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

thymikee approved these changes Dec 11, 2019

View reviewed changes

combine filters

c994954

jeysal mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2019

docs: give recommendation on jest-worker end() Promises #9310

Merged

SimenB added 3 commits December 16, 2019 17:13

bump v8-to-istanbul

c2ff7d8

add note about newer nodes

c5c1de6

extract v8 profile code

78ceba8

jeysal reviewed Dec 17, 2019

View reviewed changes

docs/CLI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

docs/CLI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

docs/Configuration.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Apply suggestions from code review

881fd82

Co-Authored-By: Tim Seckinger <seckinger.tim@gmail.com>

SimenB mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2019

Support JSDOM when collecting code coverage #9315

Closed

link to tracking issue

9c7c353

SimenB merged commit 89c151b into jestjs:master Dec 17, 2019

SimenB deleted the v8-coverage branch December 17, 2019 09:52

SimenB mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2020

[jest-worker] Detect infinite loops #10701

Closed

Zalathar mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2021

Document some of the tradeoffs of V8 coverage (vs Babel/Istanbul coverage) #11188

Closed

github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 11, 2021

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: add support for v8 code coverage #8596

feat: add support for v8 code coverage #8596

SimenB commented Jun 23, 2019 •

edited

Loading

SimenB Jun 23, 2019

coreyfarrell Jul 3, 2019

bcoe Jul 3, 2019

SimenB Jul 4, 2019

SimenB Dec 16, 2019

SimenB Jun 23, 2019

lucasfcosta Jun 23, 2019

SimenB Jun 24, 2019

lucasfcosta Jun 25, 2019

SimenB Jun 23, 2019

thymikee commented Jun 23, 2019

lucasfcosta left a comment

lucasfcosta Jun 23, 2019

jeysal commented Jun 24, 2019

scotthovestadt left a comment

scotthovestadt commented Jun 26, 2019

SimenB commented Jun 26, 2019

jeysal commented Jul 10, 2019

SimenB commented Jul 10, 2019 •

edited

Loading

sandersn commented Jul 15, 2019 •

edited

Loading

SimenB commented Jul 16, 2019

ballercat commented Jul 19, 2019 •

edited

Loading

codecov-io commented Dec 11, 2019 •

edited

Loading

thymikee left a comment

SimenB commented Dec 16, 2019

jeysal left a comment

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 •

edited

Loading

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 •

edited

Loading

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

github-actions bot commented May 11, 2021

feat: add support for v8 code coverage #8596

feat: add support for v8 code coverage #8596

Conversation

SimenB commented Jun 23, 2019 • edited Loading

Summary

Test plan

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

thymikee commented Jun 23, 2019

lucasfcosta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jeysal commented Jun 24, 2019

scotthovestadt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

scotthovestadt commented Jun 26, 2019

SimenB commented Jun 26, 2019

jeysal commented Jul 10, 2019

SimenB commented Jul 10, 2019 • edited Loading

sandersn commented Jul 15, 2019 • edited Loading

SimenB commented Jul 16, 2019

ballercat commented Jul 19, 2019 • edited Loading

codecov-io commented Dec 11, 2019 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

thymikee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SimenB commented Dec 16, 2019

jeysal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 • edited Loading

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 • edited Loading

jeysal commented Dec 17, 2019

github-actions bot commented May 11, 2021

SimenB commented Jun 23, 2019 •

edited

Loading

SimenB commented Jul 10, 2019 •

edited

Loading

sandersn commented Jul 15, 2019 •

edited

Loading

ballercat commented Jul 19, 2019 •

edited

Loading

codecov-io commented Dec 11, 2019 •

edited

Loading

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 •

edited

Loading

SimenB commented Dec 17, 2019 •

edited

Loading