Repository navigation
Expand cx() functionality #100
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
|
I’ve been toying the idea of allowing people to swap out the “cx” function with their own one, is that something you’d be interested in? |
4 replies
|
Hello! Just to let you know that this will be available in |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hey there,
I really like the features that
cvaprovides but for simple cases (where I have to concatenate classes), I used to useclsx.For the most part
cxworks fine, but I do miss theclsx({ "some-class-to-apply": someBoolean }).Are there plans to expand on that? Or maybe even just re-export clsx?
All reactions