Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OS Bundles #16

Closed
gokayokyay opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 15 comments
Closed

OS Bundles #16

gokayokyay opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 15 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone

Comments

@gokayokyay
Copy link
Contributor

Hello!
First of all, thanks for the amazing project. ❤️ I really appreciate for your efforts to save us from lots of cpu usage (no offense electron's awesome too just a little heavy).
When do you plan to create OS specific bundles? Compilation of the release profile is way too slow. Takes up to an hour with a 1 gig linux instance.

@jpochyla
Copy link
Owner

Hi! Thanks, that's great to hear. Platform bundles are definitely on the roadmap, once we have a CI (GitHub actions?) working.

@jpochyla jpochyla added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jan 10, 2021
@gokayokyay
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm okay then I'll fork and try some stuff with actions, but won't promise anything 😄

@jpochyla
Copy link
Owner

We now have Ubuntu and Mac CI working, and the artifacts (just naked executables for now) are available at the run page.

@SudoVanilla
Copy link

I mean, I guessing seeing a DEB, AppImage, Flatpak, or maybe a Snap file would be nice.

@TheEvilSkeleton
Copy link

Just created a Flatpak manifest: #141. I'm awaiting for approval so it creates a Flatpak bundle.

@reesericci
Copy link

AppImages anyone?

@cedws
Copy link

cedws commented Dec 23, 2021

I want to create a Scoop manifest but the project would need to adopt Releases for this to be viable. Well, that's not entirely true, but pulling a "nightly" binary in a package is not really any good.

Any possibility of this?

@jpochyla
Copy link
Owner

I was planning to start releasing once we reach a certain feature set, most probably including Connect support, playlist manipulation, and once we solve the audio-related problems (device switching, audio buffer underruns on high CPU). I should reify these somehow as a Milestone here.

@jpochyla jpochyla added this to the First beta release milestone Dec 24, 2021
@reesericci
Copy link

Flatpak seems to be pulling away in the Linux packaging sphere. I now believe that Flatpak is the best option for Psst.

@SudoVanilla
Copy link

SudoVanilla commented Feb 28, 2022

Flatpak is the best bet, meaning pushing it to Flathub will be a good idea.

@TheEvilSkeleton
Copy link

We could directly package it to Flathub. That's what OBS Studio did obsproject/obs-studio#5569.

@SO9010
Copy link
Contributor

SO9010 commented Sep 24, 2024

@jpochyla is the still an issue as we have got the downloads section?

@Peque
Copy link

Peque commented Sep 25, 2024

@jacksongoode It seems that #170 was closed as duplicate of this issue (#16).

Is Psst available via Flatpak/Flathub? (I haven't been able to find it in Flathub)

@SO9010
Copy link
Contributor

SO9010 commented Sep 25, 2024

@Peque it's not available yet, the reason for closing this issue is due to the fact that there is an easy downloads section. But Ill have a quick look at porting the build to flathub and then perhaps we can submit it to be in the official repository.

@Peque
Copy link

Peque commented Sep 25, 2024

@SO9010 Thanks! I opened #530 to track this issue (#170 seemed like just mentioned Flatpak, but the one I opened suggests using Flathub as a way to distribute the package). 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants