Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Homebrew Cask #53

Closed
xplosionmind opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Homebrew Cask #53

xplosionmind opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed macos MacOS-specific issues
Milestone

Comments

@xplosionmind
Copy link

Can you confirm that as of right now the only way to run the app on MacOS is by building it from source?
It would be great to have an Homebrew package of the app.

Thanks a lot!
T

@jpochyla
Copy link
Owner

Hi! I consider the current state pre-alpha, and I'm not sure if a consumer packing is appropriate at this point. We also have the Mac/Win/Linux artifacts built using GitHub Actions, this should have a link from the readme.

@jpochyla jpochyla added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels May 27, 2021
@jpochyla
Copy link
Owner

Related to #16

@jpochyla jpochyla added the macos MacOS-specific issues label Jul 15, 2021
@jpochyla jpochyla mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2021
@weltonrodrigo
Copy link

weltonrodrigo commented Nov 18, 2021

I'm trying me feet at a homebrew cask for psst.

You can see it at https://github.com/weltonrodrigo/homebrew-cask/blob/master/Casks/psst.rb

I can see you have been discussing this subject and here is why I think you should embrace this formula:

  • People are already using your software in the nightly built version
  • Download link for that version is already prominent in this GitHub repo
  • This homebrew only automates that process and makes it much easier and happier

I agree with you that a nightly build version can tarnish Psst reputation, but given that people is already using it and it's the only binary you provide right now, this risk is already been taken.

As a suggestion, I believe you can mitigate that risk by creating a stable branch and using the same service to generate a downloadable stable version. I can change the formula to use that instead.

I'm already using this formula and you know what? Psst is just fucking great! Now I can use my computer while also listening to Spotify without that ugly electron sucking all my RAM.

If you want to use this formula too, you can just:

brew install --no-quarantine weltonrodrigo/homebrew-cask/psst

If you give me the green light, I can submit my formula to the main homebrew repo, or, If you prefer, you can do it yourself.

ITWOULDBENICEs:

  • If you agree with this formula, it would be nice to have a versioned link to download the binary. That way, brew can detect and periodically upgrade to new versions.
  • It would be nice to have a (complete) list of files and directories to delete when uninstalling Psst.
  • It would be really nice to have a signed binary.

@jpochyla jpochyla added this to the First beta release milestone Dec 24, 2021
@pie-ai
Copy link

pie-ai commented May 20, 2022

I used
brew install --no-quarantine weltonrodrigo/homebrew-cask/psst
as I could not. find an apple silicon / arm build and I got it running in seconds.

Thanks a lot!

@shiftgeist
Copy link

I think this issue (#53) can be closed due to https://formulae.brew.sh/cask/psst#default

@jacksongoode
Copy link
Collaborator

jacksongoode commented Sep 25, 2024

I think this issue (#53) can be closed due to formulae.brew.sh/cask/psst#default

Yes, thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed macos MacOS-specific issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants