Sortable: Width of portables reduced from 170px to 155px; Fixed #4485 #290
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… - Portlet demo is buggy
|
This is better, but it's still buggy. The underlying problem is in the sortable widget itself. The demo just shows the problem. I think we should fix the underlying problem instead of patching over it in the demo. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sortable: Width of portables reduced from 170px to 155px; Fixed #4485 - Portlet demo is buggy
I have changed the width, because draging element from 3rd column to 1st made scrollbar to show, then the width of demo-frame was to short, and 3rd column goes below the second.