-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open Community Working Meeting 2024-01-29 - 14:00 PT #587
Comments
@benjagm I want to add an item for trying to reach agreement on a definition of lexical/dynamic scopes to continue making progress with my article. I'd like to propose @gregsdennis 's definition here: json-schema-org/website#274 (comment):
Seems to be a good middle ground from a lot of the discussions in there, and I think its both elegant and easy to understand. |
@benjagm why are we still discussing stable spec? We reached an agreement for now. Jason and I are working on it. |
We are not going to discuss the stable spec. There has been an issue with the github action adding topics to the agenda because I forgot to remove the "agenda" label so it was added again. I just removed the topic and I'll work on a fix to avoid that type of manual intervention again. |
@jviotti 's blog has been published. |
Open Community Working Meeting 2024-01-29 - 14:00 PT
📺 See Recording
⏪ Go To Previous Meeting
Agenda:
Action items:
Notes:
The discussion started with @jviotti summarizing the differing scope views found during the review of his last blog post and solicited feedback. Debate emerged around technical accuracy versus simplicity, targeting schema authors. The final decisions was to adapt the blog post targeting schema writers with a simplified approach of scopes. In addition, @gregsdennis suggested that in this context we need to consider that scope is only in regard to how references are resolved.
The discussion continued with @benjagm calling for ideas and mentors for Google Summer of Code. @jdesrosiers will think about adding an idea for the language server. @jviotti will think about adding an idea for Alter Schema and @Julian will do the same for Bowtie. @benjagm will add some for the website and some community automations.
@jdesrosiers shared and updated about his progress with the JSON Schema Language Server.
The discussion ended with @benjagm sharing a first proposal of Ambassadors Program and asked for feedback improve the proposal before its launch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: