Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Contributor

@handrews handrews commented Oct 1, 2017

Some of the info in the FAQs was stale and potentially confusing.

Also, I keep having a hard time finding them in the paragraph, so other people probably do, too. Or at least I'd like to think I'm not the only one.

I built the site and went through and checked each link.

Some of the info in these documents was stale and potentially
confusing.
I keep having a hard time finding them in the paragraph,
so other people probably do, too.  Or at least I'd like to think
I'm not the only one.
@handrews handrews requested a review from adamvoss October 1, 2017 02:05
Copy link
Contributor

@adamvoss adamvoss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Submitted handrews#1 with a potential change. Otherwise I saw no issues.

Emphasize the initial link to the migration notes page a bit more,
but leave the section further down as people still often miss
links in text.

Rework the meta-schema instructions as all-bold was too heavy
and obscured the important parts of the sentence.

Change "Other versions" to "Older drafts" to be more clear about
what the link points to.  There are not other versions in the
sense of other currently valid versions.
@handrews
Copy link
Contributor Author

handrews commented Oct 2, 2017

@adamvoss I made some changes in the direction that you suggested, but kept the section.

As a reminder (to myself as well as I am guilty of forgetting this and encourage you to call me on it the next time it happens), the goal of reviewing PRs here is:

  • Is the markup broken?
  • Has any necessary information been removed?
  • Has any incorrect or misleading information been added?
  • Is the new layout less readable than the old?

The goal is not web site design by committee. Although arguably that's what we end up with anyway, but that's a topic for elsewhere. A full re-design would be something to work out with @Relequestual when he has time to consider it.

@handrews handrews merged commit 30bcad4 into json-schema-org:master Oct 2, 2017
@handrews handrews deleted the migrate branch October 5, 2017 00:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants