Skip to content

Conversation

ishitatsuyuki
Copy link

According to namshi/jose#94, the implementation is non-conformant and broken.

According to namshi/jose#94, the implementation is non-conformant and broken.
@Oxmoze
Copy link

Oxmoze commented Aug 16, 2016

You are absolutely right: that library produces wrong signatures and rejects all valid ones.

The issues #98 and #101 need to be implemented to verify if libraries are compliant with the RFCs.
At least, all examples from the RFC7520 must pass.

@sebadoom sebadoom self-requested a review November 18, 2017 00:05
@sebadoom sebadoom self-assigned this Nov 18, 2017
sebadoom added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2017
@sebadoom
Copy link
Contributor

sebadoom commented Dec 4, 2017

Fixed in 3e67a14. Please note that the PR was wrong (removing the lines is not what was required here). In any case, thank you for your contribution.

@sebadoom sebadoom closed this Dec 4, 2017
@Spomky
Copy link
Contributor

Spomky commented Dec 4, 2017

By the way, this library is now unmaintained and should be removed from the list.

@sebadoom
Copy link
Contributor

sebadoom commented Dec 4, 2017

Thank you for your report, Spomky. We are planning to do a review to find unmaintained libraries and remove them. This is tracked in issue #277. However, thanks to your report we can remove this library before reaching that issue. Thanks again.

@sebadoom
Copy link
Contributor

sebadoom commented Dec 4, 2017

Removed in 3a7c00d

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants