Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AMS1117 on V4 PCB is not ceramic stable #129

Open
tdaede opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 10 comments
Open

AMS1117 on V4 PCB is not ceramic stable #129

tdaede opened this issue Nov 12, 2021 · 10 comments

Comments

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor

tdaede commented Nov 12, 2021

There's no github for the V4 PCB so I'm filing the issue here. The regulator on the V4, the AMS1117, is attached to a ceramic bulk cap directly, but it's not rated for ceramic stability. I haven't noticed any problems yet but it could easily cause transient problems. It's fixable by either putting a resistor in series with the output cap or switching to a ceramic stable regulator.

@keirf
Copy link
Owner

keirf commented Nov 12, 2021

Good point. We borrowed this part from the Gotek schematic but I think that does use an electrolytic at the output. If I make another batch I will have to fix this. However I currently have about 900 so it won't be soon. Luckily I haven't heard anything attributable to instability. Presumably this would be triggered by load transients at the reg output? And that is fairly unlikely in the Greaseweazle design (after startup)

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor Author

tdaede commented Nov 12, 2021

It's more likely to happen at light load. I haven't observed it personally so you're probably OK, but it can vary depending on batch and temperature so it's good to fix for the future. I just observed it when I was looking at adding trimode support.

@keirf
Copy link
Owner

keirf commented Nov 12, 2021

Interested question: What about all the smaller ceramics on the 3v3 output rail? Do they not matter so much? Due to size? Distance?

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor Author

tdaede commented Nov 12, 2021

Distance, mostly, but they can in theory cause problems too. See section 7 of https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/snva167

I've never seen bypass capacitors cause a problem myself, but also most designs with a high density of ceramic caps I've worked on also go with switching regulators or ceramic stable LDOs.

@keirf
Copy link
Owner

keirf commented Oct 27, 2022

Thinking about a rev of the GW V4 board. What would be the easiest fix here? A series resistor I'm guessing. Do you have a value in mind that would work well? Is this solution as good as replacing with an electrolytic? And any recommendations on exact placement schematically or in physical placement? Thanks!

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor Author

tdaede commented Oct 27, 2022 via email

@keirf
Copy link
Owner

keirf commented Oct 27, 2022

Thanks. I assume there's no reason to prefer a particular capacitor pin for the resistor (output side vs ground side)?

@tdaede
Copy link
Contributor Author

tdaede commented Oct 27, 2022 via email

@keirf
Copy link
Owner

keirf commented Oct 27, 2022

I don't recall your email. Always better as an issue so it can be tracked.

@kaunomedis
Copy link

I bough mine PCB on ebay. Noticed some unstability, added electrolytic caps on both sides of the 1117.
I am using 1117 for my projects and I noticed, that there are very cheap clones with stability issues, some even have even worse problems (like shorting when reversed). The "original" are much more stable. If someone is designing new PCB, it cost nothing to add place for small electrolytic cap. I even suggest polymer ones.
There is still some problems with my PCB, but I can blame very wearied out USB connectors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants