Armstrong Number solved

[Omkaragrawal]

Fixed #113 added armstrong number.

[Omkaragrawal]

hey, @TheSTL can you help me with what is the failing check about?

[TheSTL]

By reading this post from stack over flow I think coverage is decreased because some code lines are not covered in test cases. And we can get it by total test cases* code not covered in one test case.
Code not covered in single test case is because of Control Structures.
Example this code num = (!Number.isNaN(Number(num))) ? parseInt(Math.abs(Number(num)), 10).toString() : (() => { throw Error('error')
@ashokdey @Omkaragrawal

[Omkaragrawal]

Hey,
@TheSTL @ashokdey so is it ok? If not what do I need to do for it, add a case that evaluates the error?

[TheSTL]

@Omkaragrawal I think Armstrong Number should not be tested for decimals. It should throw error for decimal number or any other input except Integer.

• Remove tests for decimals.
• Add test cases where it should except to throw error

[Omkaragrawal]

Hey, there are some minor changes in the test that's it, give me some time since I have my University exams till 28th.

[ashokdey]

Ok.

[Omkaragrawal]

Hey @ashokdey I regret that I totally forgot about this. I will get to this soon and rewrite the tests.