Skip to content

Conversation

felixsanz
Copy link

This branch should contain 2.x not 1.x

This branch should contain 2.x not 1.x
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 8, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling c9c22e7 on felixsanz:patch-1 into eb9d06d on koajs:v2.x.

@haoxins
Copy link
Member

haoxins commented Jan 9, 2017

6eca69d

@jonathanong we need to correct this branch's baseline 😢

@jonathanong
Copy link
Member

lol shoot

@jonathanong
Copy link
Member

I just merged 2.0.0 into v2.x, but the commits are out of order. no big deal though. thanks @felixsanz

@jonathanong jonathanong closed this Jan 9, 2017
@felixsanz felixsanz deleted the patch-1 branch January 9, 2017 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants