-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
a self-awareness "interface" for NFT pod #13
Comments
/assign @hanlins |
@mcluseau let us know if any details we need to update here |
Had some discussion with @mcluseau, later we might introduce subcommand |
make sure those logs are really explicit and repeated periodically :) |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
The NFT tables pod is susceptible to naughty bhaviour when iptables is installed.
To remediate this, and also, to create a precendent for other service proxy backends, lets:
iptables
rules (i.e. see the ones in hack/kind recipe: Coredns cant resolve 10.96.0.1 #12) are emptywarning: ip routing may not work properly due to mutliple kernel firewalls !
This will make it really easy for folks struggling w/ the incompatibilities (iptables, legacy iptables, and nft, and so on) to know why loadbalancing rules written by NFT arent getting honored.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: