-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[workload]Avoid unnecessary allocation in HasAllChecks #1165
[workload]Avoid unnecessary allocation in HasAllChecks #1165
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just confirmation.
/approve
pkg/workload/workload.go
Outdated
if len(mustHaveChecks) > len(wl.Status.AdmissionChecks) { | ||
return false | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we use len(mustHaveChecks)
here? We use mustHaveChecks.Len()
in other places such as L448, L460.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forgot it's a set :). Done.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tenzen-y, trasc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
e6cecb4
to
9ea9de7
Compare
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 58837e90cac8df5d71ac5cb4ed5819de81dce79e
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Avoids unnecessary allocation in workload.HasAllChecks
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Relates to: #1090
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?