Include more instructions on WG creation.

[kimsterv]

No description provided.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

---

• If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
• If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
• If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please email the CNCF helpdesk: helpdesk@rt.linuxfoundation.org

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[kimsterv]

CLA signed.

[cblecker]

kubernetes/steering#27

cc: @kubernetes/steering-committee

[bgrant0607]

Thanks! This is a good start. This is effectively how we've operated.

Is there anything you think we should add in this PR @mattfarina? We could also add more in follow-up PRs.

[kow3ns]

Typically we have required SIGs to sponsor working groups. Do we require a SIG to sponsor a working group, or can a WG be formed independently of any SIG?

[parispittman]

I asked Kim to update with the SIG sponsor info (as well as some other things). Looking back on several previous WG creations, there was at least one sponsoring sig pre-proposal.

[michelleN]

Looks like #1994 is also adding some detail on WG.
I propose we accept this PR after Kim gets a chance to add the bit on sponsor SIGs and then review #1994 since it's a bit more involved. Is that okay with you @jbeda ?

[jbeda]

It looks like they are touching the same files but don't significantly overlap. My PR doesn't go into how WGs are formed but more about what they are compared to the other groups. I think there there is some open questions around how WGs are formed and added a comment above.

[idvoretskyi]

/cc

[kimsterv]

/assign @bgrant0607

[cblecker]

/ok-to-test

[idvoretskyi]

Anything that blocks us from merging it now?

[bgrant0607]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bgrant0607

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [bgrant0607]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment