Set first release version and fix gulp release pipeline

[bryk]

I propose that we start with version 0.1 and use semantic versioning.

[bryk]

@cheld @floreks Can you take a look?

[floreks]

Starting version is fine. As for the semantic versioning I think more common format is:

0.1.0-alpha.1 or 0.1.0-alpha-1

I like first better. What do you think?

[codecov-io]

Current coverage is 79.06%

Merging #328 into master will not affect coverage as of 98dc671

@@            master    #328   diff @@
======================================
  Files           68      68       
  Stmts          554     554       
  Branches         0       0       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit            438     438       
  Partial          0       0       
  Missed         116     116       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 98dc671

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

[lavvy]

I think I prefer the second option
On Feb 3, 2016 10:58 AM, "Sebastian Florek" notifications@github.com
wrote:

Starting version is fine. As for the semantic versioning I think more
common format is:

0.1.0-alpha.1 or 0.1.0-alpha-1

I like first better. What do you think?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#328 (comment).

[bryk]

I didn't want to add hyphen, because kubernetes addons have a requirement to not have it in the version (yeah, that's sad). So how about going with just 0.1.0 for start? This what http://semver.org/ advises for initial pre-release development.

[floreks]

Yeah, that's disappointing. I'd go with clean 0.1.0 then.

PS. Does 0.1.0.alpha.1 look that bad?

[bryk]

BTW. Does 0.1.0.alpha.1 look that bad?

It does not, but semver needs a dash between FOO.BAR.BAZ and alpha.1

[floreks]

Oh yeah. I see now. Due to our proxy I could not open semver page correctly...

[luxas]

The best version would be v0.1.0-alpha.1 as Kubernetes core (e.g. v1.2.0-alpha.7), but v0.1.0 is fine too
Are you OK with v in the beginning?

[floreks]

Fine by me

[lavvy]

Cool
On Feb 3, 2016 1:34 PM, "Sebastian Florek" notifications@github.com wrote:

Fine by me

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#328 (comment).

[bryk]

Updated. PTAL.

[floreks]

LGTM