New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fine-grained SupplementalGroups control #3619
Comments
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@everpeace: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/milestone v1.27 let's see if we can start it in 1.27 |
/label lead-opted-in |
/stage alpha |
Hello @everpeace Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 18:00 PDT Thursday 9th February 2023. This enhancement is targeting for stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
It looks like #3620 will address most of these issues. The status of this enhancement is marked as |
@npolshakova, kep yaml has correct values for stage, milestone, etc:
This KEP updates to the latest template and covers testing section: #3862 PRR review completed: enhancements/keps/prod-readiness/sig-node/3619.yaml Lines 1 to 6 in 472a381
So once #3862 is merged, this KEP is ready for the milestone |
Great! Looks like #3862 went in so this enhancement as tracked for v1.27. /label tracked/yes |
Hi @everpeace, Checking in as we approach 1.27 code freeze at 17:00 PDT on Tuesday 14th March 2023. Please ensure the following items are completed:
Please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k I should be tracking for this KEP. |
Hi @everpeace |
Hi @everpeace, this is the status as we approach code freeze today:
Please let me know what other PRs in k/k I should be tracking for this KEP. As always, we are here to help should questions come up. Thanks! |
Unfortunately the implementation PRs associated with this enhancement have not merged by code-freeze so this enhancement is getting removed from the release. If you would like to file an exception please see https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/blob/master/releases/EXCEPTIONS.md /milestone clear |
Enhancement Description
PodSecurityContext.SupplementalGroups
by custom container image although PSP(or other policy engines) enforces the field kubernetes#112879k/enhancements
) update PR(s):k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update PR(s):Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.
/assign
/sig node
/kind feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: