Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.13] docs: Add imageIndex field to imageData #1182

Closed

Conversation

NetanelK
Copy link

@NetanelK NetanelK commented Mar 11, 2024

Related issue

Issue - kyverno/kyverno#8273
PR - kyverno/kyverno#9883

Proposed Changes

Add imageIndex to imageData documentation.

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines.
  • I have inspected the website preview for accuracy.
  • I have signed off my issue.

Copy link

welcome bot commented Mar 11, 2024

Thanks for opening your first Pull Request here! Please check out our Contributing guidelines and confirm that you Signed off.

Signed-off-by: Netanel Kadosh <kadoshnetanel@gmail.com>
@NetanelK NetanelK force-pushed the feature/image-registry/manifest-index branch from d0da4e6 to e1d9454 Compare March 11, 2024 17:46
@chipzoller chipzoller changed the title docs: Add imageIndex field to imageData [1.13] docs: Add imageIndex field to imageData Mar 12, 2024
@chipzoller chipzoller added this to the 1.13.0 milestone Mar 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@chipzoller chipzoller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor conflict to resolve here since we did some branch maintenance.

@JimBugwadia JimBugwadia self-requested a review August 25, 2024 20:57
@JimBugwadia
Copy link
Member

@NetanelK - thanks for the contribution! Can you please resolve the conflict, so we can merge this?

@realshuting
Copy link
Member

I can't push to the forked repo, created #1182.

Thanks for sending the PR @NetanelK !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants