Repository navigation
Show and tell: a check step after the agent node — so a flow's code output gets reviewed before it ships #16195
Fikpeze123
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi all — I'm Frank, founder of Pactlyst.ai. I build in the open with AI help, and this is a small pattern I've been wiring into agent flows that I wanted to show here, because Langflow is where it reads most naturally.
The problem: a flow finishes, the output looks fluent, and it moves on. Nothing ever checked it.
So I add one step between the agent node and whatever publishes, saves, or sends the result — an API Request step that sends the finished work to Pactlyst Work Check:
That helper is the kind of thing a coding flow produces on a good day — and it's a SQL injection waiting for an id like
1 OR 1=1. The check reads the work against code playbooks (the same door also checks documents and software work) and returns a score, a verdict — Low risk, Needs review, or High risk — and a gate: Low risk flows on, Needs review waits for a named human to acknowledge the findings, High risk waits for a named human approver who isn't the requester. Every result carries a signed PactCheck Receipt™ and a public receipt link, so "the flow's output was reviewed" is something you can show later, not just remember. The work itself is never stored — hash and finding counts only.To be plain about what this is: there is no official Langflow integration. It's one HTTP step you add yourself, with a free key from pactlyst.ai — ten minutes of wiring, and if your flow speaks MCP, the same check is a
check_worktool call instead.I'm opening a small design-partner circle for teams whose flows produce work somebody has to answer for — three months of Pro free, no card. Details in the docs at pactlyst.ai/docs. Mostly, I'd value this community's read: where in a flow would you put the check?
— Frank
All reactions