-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extended gauge field routines do not handle boundary conditions correctly #173
Comments
Actually adding the R[] array to the Alex El 5/11/2014, a las 9:17, mikeaclark notifications@github.com escribió: The extended gauge copy and ghost extraction routines do not presently I think to fix this, we need a modified variant of the timeBoundary functor /** — |
Actually adding the R[] array to the GaugeField class might be enough. One Alex El 5/11/2014, a las 9:17, mikeaclark notifications@github.com escribió: The extended gauge copy and ghost extraction routines do not presently I think to fix this, we need a modified variant of the timeBoundary functor /** — |
I believe this issue is now fixed (as of commit a26d948). |
The extended gauge copy and ghost extraction routines do not presently handle the time boundary conditions correctly. When extended, the boundary condition lies on the the R[3]-1 on the first time slice of nodes and on X[3]-R[3]-1 on the last time slice of nodes (where X[] is the local extended dimensions and R[] is the extended radii dimensions).
I think to fix this, we need a modified variant of the timeBoundary functor used by the gauge field order structs. This requires a couple of additions to the GaugeField class such that any gauge field that is extended knows it is extended and it knows what the depth of the extended region is (the R[] array).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: