New Feature Store docs don't match implementation

[bianchidotdev]

The usage reference in comments show you can start call LaunchDarkly::Integrations::DynamoDB.new_feature_store with just the table name, but it actually requires 2 args right now. However, I think it'd be more ergonomic if opts defaulted to an empty hash.

Suggestion:
Change the new_feature_store function signature to def self.new_feature_store(table_name, opts = {})

This appears to not directly impact the other feature store implementations, though it's clear there's some mismatch in design (FileData defaults to empty hash, but Consul and Redis require opts even if it's an empty hash).

Ideally I'd want to not pass in an empty hash. But at the very least, the usage docs should match the implementation

Usage reference:

ruby-server-sdk/lib/ldclient-rb/integrations/dynamodb.rb

Line 25 in 986af21

# store = LaunchDarkly::Integrations::DynamoDB::new_feature_store("my-table-name")

[keelerm84]

Thank you for reporting this issue. I have filed this as internal ticket sc-142425. We will let you know once we have this resolved!

[eli-darkly]

We've released version 6.3.2 with a fix for this.