Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/function/conditional_expectation): define the conditional expectation of a function, prove the equality of integrals #9114

Closed
wants to merge 365 commits into from

Conversation

RemyDegenne
Copy link
Collaborator

@RemyDegenne RemyDegenne commented Sep 9, 2021

@RemyDegenne RemyDegenne added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 21, 2021
@RemyDegenne
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I changed the definition of condexp to make sure that m-measurable functions are sent to themselves. In order to prove that I still had μ[f|hm] =ᵐ[μ] condexp_L1 hm μ f, I had to prove results about the application of condexp_L1 and other functions to m-measurable functions.
The lemmas and definitions added are:

  • Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim, its inverse, and a couple results about it
  • Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim_lie which I introduced in a previous version, then dropped, but which is handy after all to prove results for Lp_meas by using Lp.induction on the Lp space of µ.trim hm
  • condexp_ind_of_measurable
  • condexp_L1_clm_of_ae_measurable'
  • condexp_L1_of_ae_measurable'

@RemyDegenne RemyDegenne added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Sep 23, 2021
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for formalizing this!
I left a few minor comments about docstrings.

@urkud urkud added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 24, 2021
@urkud
Copy link
Member

urkud commented Sep 24, 2021

One more remark: could you please explain the role of 𝕜 in the module docstring?

@RemyDegenne RemyDegenne added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Sep 24, 2021
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

bors r+
Thanks!!!

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 24, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2021
…ditional expectation of a function, prove the equality of integrals (#9114)

This PR puts together the generalized Bochner integral construction of #8939 and the set function `condexp_ind` of #8920 to define the conditional expectation of a function.

The equality of integrals that defines the conditional expectation is proven in `set_integral_condexp`.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 24, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(measure_theory/function/conditional_expectation): define the conditional expectation of a function, prove the equality of integrals [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/function/conditional_expectation): define the conditional expectation of a function, prove the equality of integrals Sep 24, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Sep 24, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the condexp branch September 24, 2021 13:48
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants