[Merged by Bors] - chore: golf two_lt_card_iff #11541
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ruben-VandeVelde
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2024
|
maintainer merge |
|
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by Ruben-VandeVelde. |
|
bors merge |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
mathlib-bors
bot
changed the title
dagurtomas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
utensil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
Louddy
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
atarnoam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
uniwuni
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
callesonne
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting `card_eq_three` Co-authored-by: Ruben Van de Velde <65514131+Ruben-VandeVelde@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makes the proof of this lemma shorter and perhaps cleaner by adding a new lemma and moving it forward to take advantage of the preexisting
card_eq_three