We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think the (experimental) bwa "mergepe" module would be more logically placed in seqtk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bwa's mergepe joins ends. It is a bit complicated and not well tested. I would prefer to keep it that way.
BTW, seqtk also has a mergepe. It interleaves two fastqs.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I think the (experimental) bwa "mergepe" module would be more logically placed in seqtk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: