Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment
|
Looking at how OpenCodex implements both modes in 1. Is the suspension warning precautionary or based on specific reports?The warning ( 2. Are missing voice features and separate Projects/history expected in
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi! I'd like to use Claude Code in Claude Desktop through OpenCodex, but I see the warning that first-party mode sends Claude subscription traffic through a local interception proxy and that Anthropic may suspend the account.
Do we know of any firsthand reports of someone being suspended specifically for using OpenCodex's Claude Desktop first-party mode? Or is the warning precautionary, based on Anthropic's terms and enforcement against other third-party subscription integrations?
To be clear about the setup, I mean the mode where Desktop stays signed in to claude.ai and its Code tab routes through OpenCodex, as described in the Claude Desktop modes documentation.
Gateway mode seems to have a significant usability tradeoff in my setup:
I'd really like to try Claude Code with OpenCodex while keeping the familiar signed-in Claude Desktop experience. With these limitations, using OpenCodex with Claude Desktop currently feels more limited to me than using it with Codex.
Could you clarify:
Thanks for the project! I'm trying to understand the actual evidence behind the warning and the practical tradeoff between the two modes before choosing one.
All reactions