-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lightning Specification Meeting 2023/03/13 #1058
Comments
I won't be able to attend this spec meeting, I'll be traveling at that time. On route blinding, I'd like feedback from the crowd on this comment: should this feature bit be marked as an invoice feature bit or not? It is conceptually an invoice feature, so it bothers me a bit to only mark it On dual funding, we have found an issue with how |
Won't be able to attend due to a conflict, so here're some updates on my end:
|
Transcript: bitcointranscripts/bitcointranscripts#236 |
The meeting will take place on Monday 2023/03/13 at 7pm UTC (5:30am Adelaide time) on Libera Chat IRC #lightning-dev. It is open to the public.
A video link is available for higher bandwidth communication: https://meet.jit.si/Lightning-Spec-Meeting
Recently Updated Proposals / Seeking Review
This section contains changes that have been opened or updated recently and need feedback from the meeting participants.
max_dust_htlc_exposure_msat
#919channel_reestablish
requirements Clarifychannel_reestablish
requirements #1049 or Reworkchannel_reestablish
requirements #1051Stale Proposals
This section contains pending changes that may not need feedback from the meeting participants, unless someone explicitly asks for it during the meeting. These changes are usually waiting for implementation work to happen to drive more feedback.
Waiting for interop
This section contains changes that have been conceptually ACKed and are waiting for at least two implementations to fully interoperate.
They most likely don't need to be covered during the meeting, unless someone asks for updates.
channel_reestablish
Nodes shouldn't publish their commitment when receiving outdatedchannel_reestablish
#934Long Term Updates
This section contains long-term changes that need review, but require a substantial implementation effort.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: