Skip to content

Conversation

jeremykubica
Copy link
Contributor

Add some documentation for how concatenation works.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.19%. Comparing base (f592cac) to head (0d7d1df).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #372   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.19%   98.19%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1880     1880           
=======================================
  Hits         1846     1846           
  Misses         34       34           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

Before [f592cac] After [476c884] Ratio Benchmark (Parameter)
135M 135M 1 benchmarks.CountNestedBy.peakmem_run
102M 102M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameAddNested.peakmem_run
106M 106M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameQuery.peakmem_run
105M 105M 1 benchmarks.NestedFrameReduce.peakmem_run
250M 248M 0.99 benchmarks.AssignSingleDfToNestedSeries.peakmem_run
1.37±0.01ms 1.36±0.01ms 0.99 benchmarks.NestedFrameReduce.time_run
179M 177M 0.99 benchmarks.ReadFewColumnsHTTPS.peakmem_run
1.98±0.1s 1.96±0.01s 0.99 benchmarks.ReadFewColumnsS3.time_run
270M 268M 0.99 benchmarks.ReassignHalfOfNestedSeries.peakmem_run
34.3±0.7ms 33.6±0.5ms 0.98 benchmarks.AssignSingleDfToNestedSeries.time_run

Click here to view all benchmarks.

Copy link
Collaborator

@dougbrn dougbrn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you!

@jeremykubica jeremykubica merged commit c29f7ee into main Sep 29, 2025
12 checks passed
@jeremykubica jeremykubica deleted the concat_example branch September 29, 2025 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants