Skip to content

Conversation

linuxenko
Copy link
Owner

@linuxenko linuxenko commented Mar 28, 2017

  • - Nested Components
  • - Resolve naming route props and component props conflict

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.535% when pulling 6b17165 on develop into 537eef1 on master.

@linuxenko
Copy link
Owner Author

Preparation of the first minor version of the cake. (i believe, the day will come for 💯 version)

This version provide support for nested components update for basic-virtual-dom.

@juliandavidmr, what do you think about react style props props.children and such kind of components nesting ? in other words we are free to make something different 🦄

@juliandavidmr
Copy link
Collaborator

juliandavidmr commented Mar 28, 2017

Hi! @linuxenko 🍰
I think 'props' and 'childrens' are and will be an important feature of Cakejs. Although I am now thinking how it could be better, and also other different ways to do this. All this as not to follow the same style of 'react' but something novel.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.535% when pulling 88ba1a6 on develop into 537eef1 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.535% when pulling bb500c6 on develop into 537eef1 on master.

@linuxenko linuxenko merged commit 5788cf2 into master Mar 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants