Changing category to Software Analyses #76
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrshirts
requested review from
dwsideriusNIST,
davidlmobley,
dmzuckerman and
jppiquem
mrshirts
changed the title
dmzuckerman
reviewed
Sep 21, 2019
templates/livecoms.cls
Outdated
| \documenttypetrue | ||
| \newcommand{\documenttype}{Molecular Simulation Comparison} | ||
| \newcommand{\documenttype}{Software Analyses Paper} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe it doesn't matter for this, but do we want Software Analyses [or Analysis] papers? I prefer analysis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, that was the question I proposed on Issue #76 associated with this PR
jppiquem
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2019
|
OK, since JPP approved, and people seem OK with "A LiveCoMS Software Analysis", I will merge. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changing the article type name to match the change we already made with the rest of the site. See issue #77 .