-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CIR][CIRGen][Builtin][Neon] Lower neon vqadd_v #890
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bcardosolopes
requested changes
Sep 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, one fix needed and good to go!
bcardosolopes
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2024
Hugobros3
pushed a commit
to shady-gang/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2024
as title. Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code. Notice: - I pretty much keep the skeleton of OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr at the cost of that we didn't use a few variables they calculate. They might help in the future. - The purpose of having CommonNeonBuiltinExpr is to reduce implementation code duplication. So far, we only have one type implemented, and it's hard for CIR to be more generic. But we should see if in future we can have different types of intrinsics share more generic code path. --------- Co-authored-by: Guojin He <guojinhe@meta.com>
smeenai
pushed a commit
to smeenai/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
as title. Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code. Notice: - I pretty much keep the skeleton of OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr at the cost of that we didn't use a few variables they calculate. They might help in the future. - The purpose of having CommonNeonBuiltinExpr is to reduce implementation code duplication. So far, we only have one type implemented, and it's hard for CIR to be more generic. But we should see if in future we can have different types of intrinsics share more generic code path. --------- Co-authored-by: Guojin He <guojinhe@meta.com>
smeenai
pushed a commit
to smeenai/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
as title. Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code. Notice: - I pretty much keep the skeleton of OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr at the cost of that we didn't use a few variables they calculate. They might help in the future. - The purpose of having CommonNeonBuiltinExpr is to reduce implementation code duplication. So far, we only have one type implemented, and it's hard for CIR to be more generic. But we should see if in future we can have different types of intrinsics share more generic code path. --------- Co-authored-by: Guojin He <guojinhe@meta.com>
smeenai
pushed a commit
to smeenai/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
as title. Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code. Notice: - I pretty much keep the skeleton of OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr at the cost of that we didn't use a few variables they calculate. They might help in the future. - The purpose of having CommonNeonBuiltinExpr is to reduce implementation code duplication. So far, we only have one type implemented, and it's hard for CIR to be more generic. But we should see if in future we can have different types of intrinsics share more generic code path. --------- Co-authored-by: Guojin He <guojinhe@meta.com>
keryell
pushed a commit
to keryell/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
as title. Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code. Notice: - I pretty much keep the skeleton of OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr at the cost of that we didn't use a few variables they calculate. They might help in the future. - The purpose of having CommonNeonBuiltinExpr is to reduce implementation code duplication. So far, we only have one type implemented, and it's hard for CIR to be more generic. But we should see if in future we can have different types of intrinsics share more generic code path. --------- Co-authored-by: Guojin He <guojinhe@meta.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as title.
Also add function buildCommonNeonBuiltinExpr just like OG's emitCommonNeonBuiltinExpr. This might help consolidate neon cases and share common code.
Notice: