-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[runtimes][PAC] Harden unwinding when possible #143230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ojhunt
wants to merge
17
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
users/ojhunt/pointer-authenticated-unwinding
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
57546b2
[runtimes][PAC] Harden unwinding when possible (#138571)
ojhunt dab099b
Updating to include some fixes I lost in the last update
ojhunt 65a72ab
Build fix due to not testing the build after apply review feedback \o/
ojhunt c6cfb8e
work around a bug where clang reports a template function as unused
ojhunt 3d79bd4
And another one
ojhunt 5b09bc5
Add all the required reg_t and link_reg_t decls, and unify location
ojhunt ee9689b
This erroneous error is annoying
ojhunt 61ec1ad
Remove header include that is unnecessary but apparently works in som…
ojhunt 26b7d70
Update for feature check changes
ojhunt d6375dd
yet more cleaning up
ojhunt 972edcb
cleanup compiler-rt formatting
ojhunt fd5c9f7
update libcxxabi formatting
ojhunt ad625da
Just make this a release mode failure
ojhunt 5c0e448
Address comments
ojhunt 6ceef4f
Sigh, actually make sure it builds, also address warnings
ojhunt a3a09f0
Updating for feedback
ojhunt 4d76220
whoops, wrong test
ojhunt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed previously, let's use the new macro
LIBUNWIND_PTRAUTH_CALLS_AND_RETURNS
defined as follows everywhere instead of__has_include(<ptrauth.h>)
,__has_feature(ptrauth_calls)
,__has_feature(ptrauth_returns)
,__has_extension(ptrauth_qualifier)
, etc:See proposed fix in commit 644405b in my branch https://github.com/kovdan01/llvm-project/commits/pointer-authenticated-unwinding-2025-09-22-with-fixes/.
I think this should be done in scope of this PR.