Skip to content

[Driver][Test] pgo-sample-use-profi.c: Specify targets to fix test #146996

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 4, 2025

Conversation

nilanjana87
Copy link
Contributor

@nilanjana87 nilanjana87 commented Jul 4, 2025

This test that got updated in #145957, reportedly fails for some targets (e.g. AIX). Specifying targets to fix it.

This test reportedly fails for some targets (e.g. AIX). Specifying targets to fix it.
@nilanjana87 nilanjana87 requested review from jakeegan and MaskRay July 4, 2025 04:13
@nilanjana87 nilanjana87 marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2025 04:21
@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' labels Jul 4, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 4, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Nilanjana Basu (nilanjana87)

Changes

This test that got updated in #145957, reportedly fails for some targets (e.g. AIX). Specifying targets to fix it.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146996.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/test/Driver/pgo-sample-use-profi.c (+12-6)
diff --git a/clang/test/Driver/pgo-sample-use-profi.c b/clang/test/Driver/pgo-sample-use-profi.c
index a8c8e81f96dcb..93e27c2450efe 100644
--- a/clang/test/Driver/pgo-sample-use-profi.c
+++ b/clang/test/Driver/pgo-sample-use-profi.c
@@ -6,14 +6,20 @@
 // RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
 
 // Target agnostic checks:
-// RUN: %clang -c -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
-// RUN: %clang -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
-// RUN: %clang -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fsample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
 // Cases where profi flag is explicitly disabled:
-// RUN: %clang -c -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
-// RUN: %clang -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
-// RUN: %clang -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=x86_64 -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
+// RUN: %clang --target=AArch64 -c -fsample-profile-use-profi -fno-sample-profile-use-profi -fprofile-sample-use=/dev/null -### %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK-NO-PROFI
 
 
 // CHECK: "-mllvm" "-sample-profile-use-profi"

Copy link
Contributor

@snehasish snehasish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nilanjana87 nilanjana87 merged commit 0612c4b into main Jul 4, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@nilanjana87 nilanjana87 deleted the users/nbasu/fix-no-profi-flag-test branch July 4, 2025 05:10
@llvm-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

llvm-ci commented Jul 4, 2025

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder openmp-s390x-linux running on systemz-1 while building clang at step 6 "test-openmp".

Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/88/builds/13525

Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
Step 6 (test-openmp) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'libomp :: tasking/issue-94260-2.c' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: -11

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
/home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/./bin/clang -fopenmp   -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test -L /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mbackchain -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test/ompt /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/issue-94260-2.c -o /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/Output/issue-94260-2.c.tmp -lm -latomic && /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/Output/issue-94260-2.c.tmp
# executed command: /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/./bin/clang -fopenmp -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test -L /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/src -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mbackchain -I /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test/ompt /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.src/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/issue-94260-2.c -o /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/Output/issue-94260-2.c.tmp -lm -latomic
# executed command: /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/openmp-s390x-linux/llvm.build/runtimes/runtimes-bins/openmp/runtime/test/tasking/Output/issue-94260-2.c.tmp
# note: command had no output on stdout or stderr
# error: command failed with exit status: -11

--

********************


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants