-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[MLIR][NVVM][Refactor] Refactor intrinsic lowering for NVVM Ops #157079
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Wolfram70
wants to merge
11
commits into
llvm:main
Choose a base branch
from
Wolfram70:dev/Wolfram70/mlir-nvvm-refactor-intrins
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7c7d739
[MLIR][NVVM][Refactor] Refactor intrinsic lowering for NVVM Ops
Wolfram70 81d3f9a
fix typo
Wolfram70 3fe6daa
move functions in NVVMToLLVMIRTranslation.cpp to NVVMDialect.cpp
Wolfram70 8e6b622
simplify names
Wolfram70 04310fc
fix format
Wolfram70 a4d09da
fix warnings
Wolfram70 f6a90df
use struct instead of tuple
Wolfram70 0ae224f
replace unused variables with _
Wolfram70 84b8e76
replace undef with poison
Wolfram70 78c6e07
fix warnings
Wolfram70 5697c92
fix tma_store_reduce test
Wolfram70 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why we need a constructor?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is because when returning this struct with the ternary
?
operator, aggregate initialization doesn't work and gives an error, so I added this constructor to explicitly construct the object in those cases instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, can't we use below syntax?