[mlir] Self-nominate for arith dialect maintenance

[kuhar]

Following https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#maintainers, I'd like to self-nominate for arith dialect maintenance.

As per the policy:

Maintainers are volunteering to take on the following shared responsibilities within an area of a project:
...

I believe I've been already performing most of the maintenance duties over the past few years, including direct code contributions, code reviews, and both starting and participating in relevant RFCs on discourse. You can look those up with:

• git log --author=Jakub --oneline -- 'mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Arith*' 'mlir/lib/Dialect/Arith*'
• https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Amlir%3Aarith+reviewed-by%3Akuhar
• Some notable RFCs authored: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-define-precise-arith-semantics/65507, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-poison-semantics-for-mlir/66245, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-arith-add-extended-multiplication-ops/66869, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-integer-add-with-carry-op-to-arith/64573, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-arith-should-we-support-scalar-vector-arith-bitcast-s/65427.

In addition to the core category maintainers, I can bring additional perspective as I care both about conversion to llvm (as a user) and to spirv (as a maintainer).

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

Author: Jakub Kuderski (kuhar)

Changes

Following https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#maintainers, I'd like to self-nominate for arith dialect maintenance.

As per the policy:
> Maintainers are volunteering to take on the following shared responsibilities within an area of a project:
> ...

I believe I've been already performing most of the maintenance duties over the past few years, including direct code contributions, code reviews, and both starting and participating in relevant RFCs on discourse. You can look those up with:

• git log --author=Jakub --oneline -- 'mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Arith*' 'mlir/lib/Dialect/Arith*'
• https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3Amlir%3Aarith+reviewed-by%3Akuhar
• Some notable RFCs authored: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-define-precise-arith-semantics/65507, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-poison-semantics-for-mlir/66245, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-arith-add-extended-multiplication-ops/66869, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-integer-add-with-carry-op-to-arith/64573, https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-arith-should-we-support-scalar-vector-arith-bitcast-s/65427.

In addition to the core category maintainers, I can bring additional perspective as I care both about conversion to llvm (as a user) and to spirv (as a maintainer).

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157355.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) mlir/Maintainers.md (+1-1)

diff --git a/mlir/Maintainers.md b/mlir/Maintainers.md
index 02e93eb658279..5d3b576c2e751 100644
--- a/mlir/Maintainers.md
+++ b/mlir/Maintainers.md
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ dialects, build system and language bindings.
 * ‘ptr’ Dialect ([fabianmcg](https://github.com/fabianmcg))
 
 #### Basic Compute Dialects
-* ‘arith’ Dialect (core)
+* ‘arith’ Dialect (core + [kuhar](https://github.com/kuhar))
 * ‘math’ Dialect (core)
 * Rewrite System Dialects (core)
 * Transform Dialect ([martin-luecke](https://github.com/martin-luecke), [ftynse](https://github.com/ftynse), [rolfmorel](https://github.com/rolfmorel))

[joker-eph]

LGTM.

[Groverkss]

LGTM (I'm guessing we will have the mlir council leads land the PR)

[rengolin]

I'm happy with this, too. I'll let the others in the area team acknowledge.

[banach-space]

LGTM

[dcaballe]

LGTM!

[matthias-springer]

LGTM