[compiler-rt] Update fuzzer/focus-function.test to not require shell.

[cmtice]

Replace sub-shell for-loops with python calls so this test can run in the lit internal shell. This is part of our work migrating to use the internal shell as the default for lit tests.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer

Author: None (cmtice)

Changes

Replace sub-shell for-loops with python calls so this test can run in the lit internal shell. This is part of our work migrating to use the internal shell as the default for lit tests.

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157967.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/focus-function.test (+4-5)

diff --git a/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/focus-function.test b/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/focus-function.test
index aa15692db358d..b9f0408cfa6d0 100644
--- a/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/focus-function.test
+++ b/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/focus-function.test
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 # Tests -focus_function
 #
 # TODO: don't require linux.
-# Requires full shell support for the `for` loop syntax.
-# REQUIRES: shell, linux
+# REQUIRES: linux
 UNSUPPORTED: target=aarch64{{.*}}
 
 RUN: %cpp_compiler %S/OnlySomeBytesTest.cpp -o %t-exe
@@ -22,9 +21,9 @@ FOCUS_F0: INFO: 0/1 inputs touch the focus function
 RUN: rm -rf %t-corpus
 RUN: mkdir %t-corpus
 # ABC triggers the focus function, others don't.
-RUN: echo ABC$(for((i=0;i<2048;i++)); do echo -n x; done) > %t-corpus/ABC
-RUN: echo AXY$(for((i=0;i<2048;i++)); do echo -n x; done) > %t-corpus/AXY
-RUN: echo ABX$(for((i=0;i<2048;i++)); do echo -n x; done) > %t-corpus/ABX
+RUN: %python -c 'x_str = "ABC" + "x" * 2048; print(x_str)' > %t-corpus/ABC
+RUN: %python -c 'x_str = "AXY" + "x" * 2048; print(x_str)' > %t-corpus/AXY
+RUN: %python -c 'x_str = "ABX" + "x" * 2048; print(x_str)' > %t-corpus/ABX
 
 RUN: %run %t-exe -runs=10000 -focus_function=f0 %t-corpus 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CORPUS_1_3
 CORPUS_1_3: INFO: 1/3 inputs touch the focus function

[boomanaiden154]

This is way cleaner than the bashisms actually. I forgot about multiplying strings in Python.