Skip to content

Conversation

kuzmich321
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds tests and comment docs for #105511

Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@kuzmich321
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evodius96 here we go

@kuzmich321
Copy link
Contributor Author

@EugeneZelenko Hi! Can you please help to assign @evodius96 here as a reviewer?

@evodius96
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you, @kuzmich321. Is it your intention to take over the contribution from @Swatinem?

Copy link
Contributor

@evodius96 evodius96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you for wrapping this up! Let me know if you need assistance with the merge.

@kuzmich321
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you, @kuzmich321. Is it your intention to take over the contribution from @Swatinem?

Thanks! Yes, it is. We agreed on that

@kuzmich321
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evodius96 Yes, I think I need help with the merging. I believe I don't have a write access. Thanks a lot!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 23, 2025

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

@evodius96
Copy link
Contributor

@evodius96 Yes, I think I need help with the merging. I believe I don't have a write access. Thanks a lot!

OK thanks. It looks like the code formatter is complaining. Can you run clang-format and clean it up?

@kuzmich321 kuzmich321 force-pushed the mcdc-export-testvectors-v2 branch from 31583a8 to f721125 Compare September 24, 2025 08:37
@evodius96 evodius96 merged commit 738e927 into llvm:main Sep 24, 2025
9 checks passed
Copy link

@kuzmich321 Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

mahesh-attarde pushed a commit to mahesh-attarde/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2025
It adds a new JSON array with the list of test vectors to the end of the mcdc_records.
I also bumped the json format version accordingly, which I believe wasn’t done properly in the past when new fields were added.

This PR adds tests and comment docs for
llvm#105511

---------

Co-authored-by: Arpad Borsos <swatinem@swatinem.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants