-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[ADT] Add bit_width_constexpr #161775
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ADT] Add bit_width_constexpr #161775
Conversation
This patch adds llvm::bit_width_constexpr, a constexpr version of llvm::bit_width. The new function is intended to serve as a marker. When we switch to C++20, we will most likely go through functions in llvm/ADT/bit.h and replace them with their counterparts from <bit>. With llvm::bit_width_constexpr, we can easily replace its use with std::bit_width. This patch refactors a couple of places. Specifically: - bitWidth in BitmaskEnum.h is replaced with the new function. - bitsRequired in PointerUnion.h is redefined in terms of the new function. I've used Compiler Explorer to check the equivalence: https://godbolt.org/z/1oKMK9Ez7
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata) ChangesThis patch adds llvm::bit_width_constexpr, a constexpr version of The new function is intended to serve as a marker. When we switch to This patch refactors a couple of places. Specifically:
I've used Compiler Explorer to check the equivalence: https://godbolt.org/z/1oKMK9Ez7 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161775.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/BitmaskEnum.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/BitmaskEnum.h
index 7214f25b0aa10..d464cbcfcdffd 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/BitmaskEnum.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/BitmaskEnum.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <utility>
#include "llvm/ADT/STLForwardCompat.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/bit.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"
/// LLVM_MARK_AS_BITMASK_ENUM lets you opt in an individual enum type so you can
@@ -138,10 +139,6 @@ template <typename E> constexpr std::underlying_type_t<E> Underlying(E Val) {
return U;
}
-constexpr unsigned bitWidth(uint64_t Value) {
- return Value ? 1 + bitWidth(Value >> 1) : 0;
-}
-
template <typename E, typename = std::enable_if_t<is_bitmask_enum<E>::value>>
constexpr bool operator!(E Val) {
return Val == static_cast<E>(0);
@@ -220,7 +217,7 @@ e &operator>>=(e &lhs, e rhs) {
// Enable bitmask enums in namespace ::llvm and all nested namespaces.
LLVM_ENABLE_BITMASK_ENUMS_IN_NAMESPACE();
template <typename E, typename = std::enable_if_t<is_bitmask_enum<E>::value>>
-constexpr unsigned BitWidth = BitmaskEnumDetail::bitWidth(
+constexpr unsigned BitWidth = llvm::bit_width_constexpr(
uint64_t{llvm::to_underlying(E::LLVM_BITMASK_LARGEST_ENUMERATOR)});
} // namespace llvm
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h
index ca0e1ed3d49d1..7b66177373011 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ namespace pointer_union_detail {
/// Determine the number of bits required to store integers with values < n.
/// This is ceil(log2(n)).
constexpr int bitsRequired(unsigned n) {
- return n > 1 ? 1 + bitsRequired((n + 1) / 2) : 0;
+ return n == 0 ? 0 : llvm::bit_width_constexpr(n - 1);
}
template <typename... Ts> constexpr int lowBitsAvailable() {
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/bit.h b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/bit.h
index 67c0a1c3300fa..e419ea975c02e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/bit.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/bit.h
@@ -292,6 +292,23 @@ template <typename T> [[nodiscard]] int bit_width(T Value) {
return std::numeric_limits<T>::digits - llvm::countl_zero(Value);
}
+/// Returns the number of bits needed to represent Value if Value is nonzero.
+/// Returns 0 otherwise.
+///
+/// A constexpr version of bit_width.
+///
+/// Ex. bit_width_constexpr(5) == 3.
+template <typename T> [[nodiscard]] constexpr int bit_width_constexpr(T Value) {
+ static_assert(std::is_unsigned_v<T>,
+ "Only unsigned integral types are allowed.");
+ int Width = 0;
+ while (Value > 0) {
+ Value >>= 1;
+ Width++;
+ }
+ return Width;
+}
+
/// Returns the largest integral power of two no greater than Value if Value is
/// nonzero. Returns 0 otherwise.
///
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitTest.cpp
index 88ae36c44bdb9..eaed4e1fe327d 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitTest.cpp
@@ -247,6 +247,29 @@ TEST(BitTest, BitWidth) {
EXPECT_EQ(64, llvm::bit_width(uint64_t(0xffffffffffffffffull)));
}
+TEST(BitTest, BitWidthConstexpr) {
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(0u) == 0);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(1u) == 1);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(2u) == 2);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(3u) == 2);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(4u) == 3);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(5u) == 3);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(6u) == 3);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(7u) == 3);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(8u) == 4);
+
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(255u) == 8);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(256u) == 9);
+ static_assert(llvm::bit_width_constexpr(257u) == 9);
+
+ static_assert(
+ llvm::bit_width_constexpr(std::numeric_limits<uint16_t>::max()) == 16);
+ static_assert(
+ llvm::bit_width_constexpr(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()) == 32);
+ static_assert(
+ llvm::bit_width_constexpr(std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max()) == 64);
+}
+
TEST(BitTest, CountlZero) {
uint8_t Z8 = 0;
uint16_t Z16 = 0;
|
This patch adds llvm::bit_width_constexpr, a constexpr version of
llvm::bit_width.
The new function is intended to serve as a marker. When we switch to
C++20, we will most likely go through functions in llvm/ADT/bit.h and
replace them with their counterparts from . With
llvm::bit_width_constexpr, we can easily replace its use with
std::bit_width.
This patch refactors a couple of places. Specifically:
bitWidth in BitmaskEnum.h is replaced with the new function.
bitsRequired in PointerUnion.h is redefined in terms of the new
function.
I've used Compiler Explorer to check the equivalence:
https://godbolt.org/z/1oKMK9Ez7