-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[RISCV] Replace uses of RISCV::NoRegister with Register() or isValid. NFC #161781
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… or operator bool. NFC
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Craig Topper (topperc) ChangesFull diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161781.diff 5 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
index 7d4535ad46916..a73e24f102b6c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFrameLowering.cpp
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ static MCRegister getRVVBaseRegister(const RISCVRegisterInfo &TRI,
MCRegister BaseReg = TRI.getSubReg(Reg, RISCV::sub_vrm1_0);
// If it's not a grouped vector register, it doesn't have subregister, so
// the base register is just itself.
- if (BaseReg == RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (!BaseReg)
BaseReg = Reg;
return BaseReg;
}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
index 6a6ead2697591..9062e3706e487 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static bool hasUndefinedPassthru(const MachineInstr &MI) {
// All undefined passthrus should be $noreg: see
// RISCVDAGToDAGISel::doPeepholeNoRegPassThru
const MachineOperand &UseMO = MI.getOperand(UseOpIdx);
- return UseMO.getReg() == RISCV::NoRegister || UseMO.isUndef();
+ return !UseMO.getReg() || UseMO.isUndef();
}
/// Return true if \p MI is a copy that will be lowered to one or more vmvNr.vs.
@@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ void RISCVInsertVSETVLI::emitVSETVLIs(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
Register Reg = VLOp.getReg();
// Erase the AVL operand from the instruction.
- VLOp.setReg(RISCV::NoRegister);
+ VLOp.setReg(Register());
VLOp.setIsKill(false);
if (LIS) {
LiveInterval &LI = LIS->getInterval(Reg);
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ void RISCVInsertVSETVLI::coalesceVSETVLIs(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.getReg().isVirtual())
return;
Register OldVLReg = MO.getReg();
- MO.setReg(RISCV::NoRegister);
+ MO.setReg(Register());
if (LIS)
LIS->shrinkToUses(&LIS->getInterval(OldVLReg));
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
index 1e6b04f8a4281..25ebd7946f822 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInstrInfo.cpp
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ void RISCVInstrInfo::insertIndirectBranch(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
RS->scavengeRegisterBackwards(RISCV::GPRRegClass, MI.getIterator(),
/*RestoreAfter=*/false, /*SpAdj=*/0,
/*AllowSpill=*/false);
- if (TmpGPR != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (TmpGPR)
RS->setRegUsed(TmpGPR);
else {
// The case when there is no scavenged register needs special handling.
@@ -3021,7 +3021,7 @@ bool RISCVInstrInfo::verifyInstruction(const MachineInstr &MI,
ErrInfo = "Invalid operand type for VL operand";
return false;
}
- if (Op.isReg() && Op.getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister) {
+ if (Op.isReg() && Op.getReg().isValid()) {
const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MI.getParent()->getParent()->getRegInfo();
auto *RC = MRI.getRegClass(Op.getReg());
if (!RISCV::GPRRegClass.hasSubClassEq(RC)) {
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVMakeCompressible.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVMakeCompressible.cpp
index f8d33ae8d24ca..54569b1f7aaf3 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVMakeCompressible.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVMakeCompressible.cpp
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static RegImmPair getRegImmPairPreventingCompression(const MachineInstr &MI) {
if (isCompressibleLoad(MI) || isCompressibleStore(MI)) {
const MachineOperand &MOImm = MI.getOperand(2);
if (!MOImm.isImm())
- return RegImmPair(RISCV::NoRegister, 0);
+ return RegImmPair(Register(), 0);
int64_t Offset = MOImm.getImm();
int64_t NewBaseAdjust = getBaseAdjustForCompression(Offset, Opcode);
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static RegImmPair getRegImmPairPreventingCompression(const MachineInstr &MI) {
}
}
}
- return RegImmPair(RISCV::NoRegister, 0);
+ return RegImmPair(Register(), 0);
}
// Check all uses after FirstMI of the given register, keeping a vector of
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVectorPeephole.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVectorPeephole.cpp
index ffba2843bde1f..8f1b4cac4b3bc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVectorPeephole.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVVectorPeephole.cpp
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::convertAllOnesVMergeToVMv(MachineInstr &MI) const {
// vmv.v.v doesn't have a mask operand, so we may be able to inflate the
// register class for the destination and passthru operands e.g. VRNoV0 -> VR
MRI->recomputeRegClass(MI.getOperand(0).getReg());
- if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg())
MRI->recomputeRegClass(MI.getOperand(1).getReg());
return true;
}
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::convertSameMaskVMergeToVMv(MachineInstr &MI) {
Register FalseReg = MI.getOperand(2).getReg();
if (TruePassthruReg != FalseReg) {
// If True's passthru is undef see if we can change it to False
- if (TruePassthruReg != RISCV::NoRegister ||
+ if (TruePassthruReg.isValid() ||
!MRI->hasOneUse(MI.getOperand(3).getReg()) ||
!ensureDominates(MI.getOperand(2), *True))
return false;
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::convertSameMaskVMergeToVMv(MachineInstr &MI) {
// vmv.v.v doesn't have a mask operand, so we may be able to inflate the
// register class for the destination and passthru operands e.g. VRNoV0 -> VR
MRI->recomputeRegClass(MI.getOperand(0).getReg());
- if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg())
MRI->recomputeRegClass(MI.getOperand(1).getReg());
return true;
}
@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::convertToUnmasked(MachineInstr &MI) const {
if (RISCVII::isFirstDefTiedToFirstUse(MaskedMCID)) {
unsigned PassthruOpIdx = MI.getNumExplicitDefs();
if (HasPassthru) {
- if (MI.getOperand(PassthruOpIdx).getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (MI.getOperand(PassthruOpIdx).getReg())
MRI->recomputeRegClass(MI.getOperand(PassthruOpIdx).getReg());
} else
MI.removeOperand(PassthruOpIdx);
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static bool dominates(MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator A,
bool RISCVVectorPeephole::ensureDominates(const MachineOperand &MO,
MachineInstr &Src) const {
assert(MO.getParent()->getParent() == Src.getParent());
- if (!MO.isReg() || MO.getReg() == RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.getReg())
return true;
MachineInstr *Def = MRI->getVRegDef(MO.getReg());
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::ensureDominates(const MachineOperand &MO,
bool RISCVVectorPeephole::foldUndefPassthruVMV_V_V(MachineInstr &MI) {
if (RISCV::getRVVMCOpcode(MI.getOpcode()) != RISCV::VMV_V_V)
return false;
- if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (MI.getOperand(1).getReg().isValid())
return false;
// If the input was a pseudo with a policy operand, we can give it a tail
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::foldVMV_V_V(MachineInstr &MI) {
// Src needs to have the same passthru as VMV_V_V
MachineOperand &SrcPassthru = Src->getOperand(Src->getNumExplicitDefs());
- if (SrcPassthru.getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister &&
+ if (SrcPassthru.getReg().isValid() &&
SrcPassthru.getReg() != Passthru.getReg())
return false;
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ bool RISCVVectorPeephole::foldVMV_V_V(MachineInstr &MI) {
if (SrcPassthru.getReg() != Passthru.getReg()) {
SrcPassthru.setReg(Passthru.getReg());
// If Src is masked then its passthru needs to be in VRNoV0.
- if (Passthru.getReg() != RISCV::NoRegister)
+ if (Passthru.getReg())
MRI->constrainRegClass(
Passthru.getReg(),
TII->getRegClass(Src->getDesc(), SrcPassthru.getOperandNo(), TRI));
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two quibbles, but neither of them major enough to block this.
I don't understand when you've chosen to use Register::operator bool
and Register::isValid
, especially when using one of those two on the result of MCOperand::getReg
.
// If it's not a grouped vector register, it doesn't have subregister, so | ||
// the base register is just itself. | ||
if (BaseReg == RISCV::NoRegister) | ||
if (!BaseReg) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Quibble - MCRegister doesn't have an operator bool
, you're using the operator unsigned
here, and then assuming that NoRegister has falsey value - but using RISCV::NoRegister is a way to remove that assumption, or you could do the following:
if (!BaseReg) | |
if (!BaseReg.isValid()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my prior conversations with @arsenm, I think we decided that we will add an operator bool
when we remove operator unsigned
.
No description provided.