Skip to content

Conversation

MilkeeyCat
Copy link
Contributor

@MilkeeyCat MilkeeyCat commented Oct 3, 2025

I'm not familiar with how every target handles this generic opcode but I think it shouldn't break anything and it makes sense to use ptype0 because G_GLOBAL_VALUE returns a pointer.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@MilkeeyCat MilkeeyCat force-pushed the pr_set_g_global_value_out_operand_to_ptr_type branch from 0af57db to 2cde250 Compare October 3, 2025 18:47
@MilkeeyCat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arsenm @jurahul

@jurahul jurahul requested review from arsenm and jurahul October 3, 2025 22:25
@jurahul
Copy link
Contributor

jurahul commented Oct 3, 2025

Seems reasonable to me but will defer to the other reviewers here.

@jurahul jurahul requested review from aemerson and qcolombet October 3, 2025 22:28
@arsenm arsenm enabled auto-merge (squash) October 4, 2025 00:10
@arsenm arsenm merged commit 0b543e3 into llvm:main Oct 4, 2025
9 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2025

@MilkeeyCat Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

@llvm-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

llvm-ci commented Oct 4, 2025

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder mlir-nvidia-gcc7 running on mlir-nvidia while building llvm at step 7 "test-build-check-mlir-build-only-check-mlir".

Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/116/builds/19248

Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
Step 7 (test-build-check-mlir-build-only-check-mlir) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -gpu-kernel-outlining  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(gpu.module(strip-debuginfo,convert-gpu-to-nvvm),nvvm-attach-target)'  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -gpu-async-region -gpu-to-llvm -reconcile-unrealized-casts -gpu-module-to-binary="format=fatbin"  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -async-to-async-runtime -async-runtime-ref-counting  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -convert-async-to-llvm -convert-func-to-llvm -convert-arith-to-llvm -convert-cf-to-llvm -reconcile-unrealized-casts  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-runner    --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_cuda_runtime.so    --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_async_runtime.so    --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_runner_utils.so    --entry-point-result=void -O0  | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -gpu-kernel-outlining
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt '-pass-pipeline=builtin.module(gpu.module(strip-debuginfo,convert-gpu-to-nvvm),nvvm-attach-target)'
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -gpu-async-region -gpu-to-llvm -reconcile-unrealized-casts -gpu-module-to-binary=format=fatbin
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -async-to-async-runtime -async-runtime-ref-counting
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-opt -convert-async-to-llvm -convert-func-to-llvm -convert-arith-to-llvm -convert-cf-to-llvm -reconcile-unrealized-casts
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/mlir-runner --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_cuda_runtime.so --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_async_runtime.so --shared-libs=/vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/lib/libmlir_runner_utils.so --entry-point-result=void -O0
# .---command stderr------------
# | 'cuStreamWaitEvent(stream, event, 0)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventDestroy(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuStreamWaitEvent(stream, event, 0)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventDestroy(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuStreamWaitEvent(stream, event, 0)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuStreamWaitEvent(stream, event, 0)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventDestroy(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventDestroy(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventSynchronize(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# | 'cuEventDestroy(event)' failed with 'CUDA_ERROR_CONTEXT_IS_DESTROYED'
# `-----------------------------
# executed command: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.obj/bin/FileCheck /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir
# .---command stderr------------
# | /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir:68:12: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
# |  // CHECK: [84, 84]
# |            ^
# | <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
# | Unranked Memref base@ = 0x5cd79c16b100 rank = 1 offset = 0 sizes = [2] strides = [1] data = 
# | ^
# | <stdin>:2:1: note: possible intended match here
# | [42, 42]
# | ^
# | 
# | Input file: <stdin>
# | Check file: /vol/worker/mlir-nvidia/mlir-nvidia-gcc7/llvm.src/mlir/test/Integration/GPU/CUDA/async.mlir
# | 
# | -dump-input=help explains the following input dump.
# | 
# | Input was:
# | <<<<<<
# |             1: Unranked Memref base@ = 0x5cd79c16b100 rank = 1 offset = 0 sizes = [2] strides = [1] data =  
# | check:68'0     X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ error: no match found
# |             2: [42, 42] 
# | check:68'0     ~~~~~~~~~
# | check:68'1     ?         possible intended match
...

@MilkeeyCat
Copy link
Contributor Author

MilkeeyCat commented Oct 4, 2025

Is my change responsible for the test failure?

There're test failures with the same message which happened before my commit, so I'd assume my change didn't break anything.

@MilkeeyCat MilkeeyCat deleted the pr_set_g_global_value_out_operand_to_ptr_type branch October 4, 2025 10:01
@arsenm
Copy link
Contributor

arsenm commented Oct 4, 2025

Is my change responsible for the test failure?

No

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants