-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
[lld/ELF] Hint if R_X86_64_PC32 overflows and references a SHF_X86_64_LARGE section #73045
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…_LARGE section Makes it clearer what the issue is when hand-written assembly doesn't follow medium code model assumptions in a medium code model build. Alternative to llvm#71248 by only hinting on an overflow.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-elf @llvm/pr-subscribers-lld Author: Arthur Eubanks (aeubanks) ChangesMakes it clearer what the issue is when hand-written assembly doesn't follow medium code model assumptions in a medium code model build. Alternative to #71248 by only hinting on an overflow. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73045.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp b/lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp
index fe3d7f419e84aa6..37a2363094020d0 100644
--- a/lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp
+++ b/lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp
@@ -105,6 +105,12 @@ void elf::reportRangeError(uint8_t *loc, const Relocation &rel, const Twine &v,
hint = "; references '" + lld::toString(*rel.sym) + '\'';
else if (auto *d = dyn_cast<Defined>(rel.sym))
hint = ("; references section '" + d->section->name + "'").str();
+
+ if (rel.type == R_X86_64_PC32 && rel.sym->getOutputSection() &&
+ (rel.sym->getOutputSection()->flags & SHF_X86_64_LARGE)) {
+ hint += "; a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation should not reference a section "
+ "marked SHF_X86_64_LARGE";
+ }
}
if (!errPlace.srcLoc.empty())
hint += "\n>>> referenced by " + errPlace.srcLoc;
diff --git a/lld/test/ELF/x86-64-pc32-overflow-large.s b/lld/test/ELF/x86-64-pc32-overflow-large.s
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..54c20eddfd04c33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lld/test/ELF/x86-64-pc32-overflow-large.s
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# REQUIRES: x86
+# RUN: split-file %s %t
+# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 %t/a.s -o %t/a.o
+# RUN: not ld.lld %t/a.o -T %t/lds -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+# CHECK: error: {{.*}}a.o:(.text+{{.*}}): relocation R_X86_64_PC32 out of range: {{.*}}; a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation should not reference a section marked SHF_X86_64_LARGE
+
+#--- a.s
+.text
+.globl _start
+.type _start, @function
+_start:
+ movq hello(%rip), %rax
+
+.section ldata,"awl",@progbits
+.type hello, @object
+.globl hello
+hello:
+.long 1
+
+#--- lds
+SECTIONS {
+ .text 0x100000 : { *(.text) }
+ ldata 0x80200000 : { *(ldata) }
+}
|
lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp
Outdated
if (config->emachine == EM_X86_64 && rel.type == R_X86_64_PC32 && | ||
rel.sym->getOutputSection() && | ||
(rel.sym->getOutputSection()->flags & SHF_X86_64_LARGE)) { | ||
hint += "; a R_X86_64_PC32 relocation should not reference a section " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the diagnostic the sentence can be more precise. Perhaps ; R_X86_64_PC32 should not reference a section marked
. In other messages we do use R_*
to refer to a relocation of the type.
…_LARGE section (llvm#73045) Makes it clearer what the issue is when hand-written assembly doesn't follow medium code model assumptions in a medium code model build. Alternative to llvm#71248 by only hinting on an overflow.
Makes it clearer what the issue is when hand-written assembly doesn't follow medium code model assumptions in a medium code model build.
Alternative to #71248 by only hinting on an overflow.