Skip to content

Conversation

RainbowMango
Copy link

I collected PRs sent by guys:

  • Me
  • You
  • serathius
  • wuyafang

Grouped them by commits.

@logicalhan logicalhan merged commit bf0e613 into logicalhan:metrics-stability-beta Oct 30, 2019
@logicalhan
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

logicalhan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2021
logicalhan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2021
Minor formatting/typo fixes and disambiguate explanation of smtaware policy
logicalhan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2022
chore: use snake case for non-generated proto API
logicalhan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2023
…ategy (kubernetes#3661)

* Initial KEP for improving pruning in kubectl apply

* Add design details

Co-authored-by: Katrina Verey <katrina.verey@shopify.com>

* Add another open question

* Links, clarifications, ownerRef and GKNN explanations

* Follow-on to initial feedback, address some unresolved blocks

* Fix lint errors

* Add more detail about reference implementation (#2)

* Apply prune jan25 (#3)

* More clearly delineate specification vs kubectl details

* Move design details of spec to Design Details section

* Updates from synchronous conversation

* Remove leftover paragraph (kubernetes#5)

Not an alternative rejected any more, given applyset.k8s.io/inventory

* Justin has always been coauthor

* KEP-3659: production readiness etc (kubernetes#4)

Fill in the testing/ PRR sections.

* Fix test failures

* Prune: document confused deputy attack and mitigations

Likely pushes us to GKNN-derived IDs.

* Constrain applyset id

We just choose the constrained applyset id to prevent "applyset ID
impersonation".

* Update KEP and PRR metadata

* Enhance testing description

* ID vs name fixes

* Fixes from soltysh's review

---------

Co-authored-by: Justin Santa Barbara <justinsb@google.com>
logicalhan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
address API review comments for extra mappings
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants