Make List.repeatWith and List.range generic

[brekk]

[brekk]

This issue is linked as the new tests aren't format-able: #146

[aboeglin]

I’m confused, why not just make List.range generic?

[brekk]

I’m confused, why not just make List.range generic?

Ah, I'm open to that, but my original thinking was that range seems like it ought to be not part of List at all. Short.range / Integer.range makes intuitive sense to me, but List.range feels like it's only associated with lists by happenstance.

[aboeglin]

Well, in a way it’s a List constructor after all.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.03%. Comparing base (3187435) to head (a5d54e4).

❗ Current head a5d54e4 differs from pull request most recent head 8a83a59. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8a83a59 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #145      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.00%   74.03%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          81       81              
  Lines       11891    11877      -14     
==========================================
- Hits         8800     8793       -7     
+ Misses       3091     3084       -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[aboeglin]

Forgot about that one, it can go as well!